Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

An advanced selective reduction process for NOx control

Abstract

The combustion of coal and heavy oil produces significant quantities of NOx (NO + NO2), which ultimately participates in photochemical smog and acid rain. Combustion modification schemes, such as staged combustion1 and reburning2, or downstream injection of selective reducing agents, particularlarly ammonia3 and urea4, can significantly reduce NOx emissions, but their effectiveness may be limited by operating constraints. Perry and Siebers5 described a selective reduction process using cyanuric acid, reported to be effective over a broad temperature range. Here we report new data that indicate that the same reductions can be achieved without stainless steel to activate the reaction mechanism, if the process is combined with reburning or staged combustion (or slightly fuel-rich operation in internal combustion) to produce carefully controlled stoichiometry. The NOx reductions that can be achieved with cyanuric acid and other –NH- and –CN-containing compounds at relatively low temperatures exceed those possible with either combustion modifications or selective reduction techniques alone or in normal combination.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wendt, J. O. L., Pcrshing, D. W., Lee, J. W. & Glass, J. W. 17th Int. Symp. (Combustion Institute, 1979).

  2. Chen, S. L. et al. 21st Int. Symp. (Combustion Institute, 1987).

  3. Lyon, R. K. Hydrocarbon Processing 58, 10 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arand, J. K., Muzio, L. J. & Sottic, J. G. US Patent No. 4,208,386 (1980).

  5. Perry, R. A. & Siebers, D. L. Nature 324, 657–658 (1986).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bowman, C. T. 14th Int. Symp. (Combustion Institute, 1973).

  7. Chen, S. L., Heap, M. P., Pershing, D. W. & Martin, G. B. 19th Int. Symp. (Combustion Institute, 1982).

  8. England, G. C., Heap, M. P., Pershing, D. W., Nihart, R. K. & Martin, G. B. 18th Int.Symp. (Combustion Institute, 1981).

  9. Brogan, T. R. US Patent 4,335,084 (1982).

  10. Arand, J. K. US Patent 4,325,924 (1982).

  11. Chen, S. L. et al. 22nd Int. Symp. (Combustion Institute, 1988).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heap, M., Chen, S., Kramlich, J. et al. An advanced selective reduction process for NOx control. Nature 335, 620–622 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1038/335620a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/335620a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing