Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Increased polar stratospheric ozone losses and delayed eventual recovery owing to increasing greenhouse-gas concentrations

Nature volume 392, pages 589–592 (1998)Cite this article

Abstract

The chemical reactions responsible for stratospheric ozone depletion are extremely sensitive to temperature1. Greenhouse gases warm the Earth's surface but cool the stratosphere radiatively2,3,4,5 and therefore affect ozone depletion. Here we investigate the interplay between projected future emissions of greenhouse gases and levels of ozone-depleting halogen species using a global climate model that incorporates simplified ozone-depletion chemistry. Temperature and wind changes induced by the increasing greenhouse-gas concentrations alter planetary-wave propagation in our model, reducing the frequency of sudden stratospheric warmings in the Northern Hemisphere4. This results in a more stable Arctic polar vortex, with significantly colder temperatures in the lower stratosphere and concomitantly increased ozone depletion. Increased concentrations of greenhouse gases might therefore be at least partly responsible for the very large Arctic ozone losses observed in recent winters6,7,8,9. Arctic losses reach a maximum in the decade 2010 to 2019 in our model, roughly a decade after the maximum in stratospheric chlorine abundance. The mean losses are about the same as those over the Antarctic during the early 1990s, with geographically localized losses of up to two-thirds of the Arctic ozone column in the worst years. The severity and the duration of the Antarctic ozone hole are also predicted to increase because of greenhouse-gas-induced stratospheric cooling over the coming decades.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Emission trends for CO2, N2O, CH4, CFCs and chlorine (Cly) used as input to the model runs.
Figure 2: Decadally averaged vertical profiles of zonal mean ozone losses during September for the Southern Hemisphere and during March for the Northern Hemisphere.
Figure 3: Total column ozone loss averaged over 2010–19, during September for the Southern Hemisphere (top) and March for the Northern Hemisph.
Figure 4: Total column ozone minima in the polar regions during spring.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 1994(Rep. 37, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, (1995).

  2. Fels, S. B., Mahlman, J. D., Schwarzkopf, M. D. & Sinclair, R. W. Stratospheric sensitivity to perturbations in ozone and carbon dioxide: radiative and dynamical response. J. Atmos. Sci. 37, 2265–2297 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rind, D., Suozzo, R., Balachandran, N. K. & Prather, M. J. Climate change and the middle atmosphere. Part I: the doubled CO2climate. J. Atmos. Sci. 47, 475–494 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rind, D., Shindell, D. T., Lonergan, P. & Balachandran, N. K. Climate change and the middle atmosphere. Part III: the doubled CO2climate revisited. J. Clim.(in the press).

  5. Mahfouf, J. F., Cariolle, D., Royer, J.-F., Geleyn, J.-F. & Timbal, B. Response of the Météo-France climate model to changes in CO2and sea surface temperature. Clim. Dyn. 9, 345–362 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Manney, G. L., Santee, M. L., Froidevaux, L., Waters, J. W. & Zurek, R. W. Polar vortex conditions during the 1995–96 Arctic winter: Meteorology and MLS ozone. Geophys. Res. Lett. 23, 3203–3206 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Müller, R.et al. Severe chemical ozone loss during the Arctic winter of 1995–96. Nature 389, 709–712 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rex, M.et al. Prolonged stratospheric ozone loss in the 1995–96 Arctic winter. Nature 389, 835–838 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Newman, P. A., Gleason, J. F., McPeters, R. D. & Stolarski, R. S. Anomalously low ozone over the Arctic. Geophys. Res. Lett. 24, 2689–2692 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rind, D.et al. The GISS global climate/middle atmosphere model. Part I: model structure and climatology. J. Atmos. Sci. 45, 329–370 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shindell, D. T., Wong, S. & Rind, D. Interannual variability of the Antarctic ozone hole in a GCM. Part 1: the influence of tropospheric wave variability. J. Atmos. Sci. 54, 2308–2319 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. von Clarmann, T.et al. Determination of the stratospheric chlorine budget in the spring arctic vortex from MIPAS B limb emission spectra and air sampling experiments. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 13979–13997 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Woodbridge, E. L.et al. Estimates of total organic and inorganic chlorine in the lower stratosphere from in situ and flask measurements during AASE II. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 3057–3064 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Shindell, D. T., Rind, D. & Lonergan, P. Climate change and the middle atmosphere. Part IV: ozone response to doubled CO2. J. Clim.(in the press).

  15. Shindell, D. T. & de Zafra, R. L. Limits on heterogeneous processing in the Antarctic spring vortex from a comparison of measured and modelled chlorine. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 1441–1449 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jaeglé, L.et al. Evolution and stoichiometry of heterogeneous processing in the Antarctic stratosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 13235–13253 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shindell, D. T. & de Zafra, R. L. Chlorine monoxide in the Antarctic spring vortex 2. A comparison of measured and modelled diurnal cycling over McMurdo Station, 1993. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 1475–1487 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Santee, M. L., Manney, G. L., Read, W. G., Froidevaux, L. & Walters, J. W. Polar vortex conditions during the 1995–96 Arctic winter: MLS ClO and HNO3. Geophys. Res. Lett. 23, 3207–3210 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pitari, G., Palermi, S., Visconti, G. & Prinn, R. G. Ozone response to a CO2doubling: results from a stratospheric circulation model with heterogeneous chemistry. J. Geophys. Res. 97, 5953–5962 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cariolle, D., Lasserre-Bogorry, A., Royer, J. F. & Geleyn, J. F. Ageneral circulation model simulation of the springtime Antarctic ozone decrease and its impact on mid-latitutes. J. Geophys. Res. 95, 1883–1898 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mahlman, J. D., Pinto, J. P. & Umscheid, L. J. Transport, radiative, and dynamical effects of the Antarctic ozone hole: A GFDL “SKYHI” model experiment. J. Atmos. Sci. 51, 489–508 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Austin, J., Butchart, N. & Shine, K. Possibility of an Arctic ozone hole in a doubled-CO2climate. Nature 360, 221–225 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Austin, J. & Butchart, N. The influence of climate change and the timing of stratospheric warmings on Arctic ozone depletion. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 1127–1145 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. O'Neill, A. & Pope, V. D. Simulation of linear and non-linear disturbances in the stratosphere. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Sci. 114, 1063–1075 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Houghton, J. T., Callander, B. A. & Varney, S. K. (eds Climate Change 1992; The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment(Cambridge Univ. Press, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pawson, S. & Naujokat, B. Trends in daily wintertime temperatures in the northern stratosphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 24, 575–578 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kodera, K. & Koide, H. Spatial and seasonal characteristics of recent decadal trends in the northern hemispheric troposphere and stratosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 19433–19447 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zurek, R. W., Manney, G. L., Miller, A. J., Gelman, M. E. & Nagatani, R. M. Interannual variability of the north polar vortex in the lower stratosphere during the UARS mission. Geophys. Res. Lett. 23, 289–292 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Farman, J. C., Gardiner, B. G. & Shanklin, J. D. Large losses of total ozone in Antarctica reveal seasonal ClOx /NOx interaction. Nature 315, 207–210 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Montzka, S. A.et al. Decline in the tropospheric abundance of halogen from halocarbons: Implications for stratospheric ozone depletion. Science 272, 1318–1322 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Hansen, R. de Zafra, G. Schmidt and J. Knox for comments. This work was supported by the NASA Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling and Analysis Program and the NASA Climate Modeling Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies and Center for Climate Systems Research, Columbia University, 2880 Broadway, New York, 10025, New York, USA

    Drew T. Shindell, David Rind & Patrick Lonergan

Authors
  1. Drew T. Shindell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Rind
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Patrick Lonergan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Drew T. Shindell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shindell, D., Rind, D. & Lonergan, P. Increased polar stratospheric ozone losses and delayed eventual recovery owing to increasing greenhouse-gas concentrations. Nature 392, 589–592 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/33385

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/33385

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing