Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Divergent homeo box proteins recognize similar DNA sequences in Drosophila

Abstract

A member of a small group of genes in Drosophila that define the segmentation pattern of the early embryo1–5 even-skipped (eve), which plays a key role in a network of interactions among segmentation genes. It appears to control morphogenesis by regulating the expression of the segmentation gene engrailed (en)3,4, and by autoregulating its own expression (M. Frasch and M.L., in preparation). Here we show that these regulatory interactions could occur at the level of transcription as a full-length eve protein binds with high affinity to specific sequences located near the 5' ends of the eve and en genes. The en binding sites contain at least one copy of a 10-base pair consensus sequence: T-C-A-A-T-T-A-A-A-T. In contrast, the 5' eve binding sites are relatively G-C rich and do not share obvious similarities with the 10-base pair consensus sequence associated with en. Other homeo box proteins can recognize both classes of eve binding sites, lending support to the proposal that regulatory interactions among homeo box genes involve a competition of different homeo box proteins for similar cis regulatory sequences6,7.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Nusslein-Volhard, C. & Wieschaus, E. Nature 287, 795–801 (1980).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Nusslein-Volhard, C., Kluding, H. & Jurgens, G. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 50, 145–154 (1985).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Harding, K., Rushlow, C., Doyle, H. J., Hocy, T. & Levine, M. Science 233, 953–959 (1986).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Macdonald, P. M., Ingham, P. W. & Struhl, G. Cell 47, 721–734 (1986).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Frasch, M., Hoey, T., Rushlow, C., Doyle, H. & Levine, M. EMBO J. 6, 749–759 (1987).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Desplan, C., Theis, J. & O'Farrell, P. H. Nature 318, 630–635 (1985).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Harding, K., Wedeen, C., McGinnis, W. & Levine, M. Science 229, 1236–1242 (1985).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Studier, F. W. & Moffatt, B. A. J. molec. Biol. 189, 113–130 (1986).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    McKay, R. J. molec. Biol. 145, 471–488 (1981).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Galas, D. & Schmitz, A. Nucleic Acids Res. 5, 3157–3170 (1978).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Poole, S. J., Kauvar, L. M., Drees, B. & Kornberg, T. Cell 40, 37–43 (1985).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Wakimoto, B. T., Turner, F. R. & Kaufman, T. C. Devl Biol. 102, 147–172 (1984).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Doyle, H. J., Harding, K., Hoey, T. & Levine, M. Nature 323, 76–79 (1986).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Rushlow, C., Doyle, H., Hoey, T. & Levine, M. Genes & Dev. 1, 1268–1279 (1987).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Kilcherr, F., Baumgartner, S., Bopp, D., Frei, E. & Noll, M. Nature 313, 284–289 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Frigerio, G., Burri, M., Bopp, D., Baumgartner, S. & Noll, M. Cell 47, 735–746 (1986).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Miller, A. M., MacKay, V. L. & Nasmyth, K. Nature 314, 598–603 (1985).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Ptashne, M. et al. Cell 19, 1–11 (1980).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Drees, B. et al. EMBO J. 6, 2803–2809 (1987).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Zoller, M. J. & Smith, M. DNA 3, 479–488 (1984).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Heberlein, U., England, B. & Tjian, R. Cell 41, 965–977 (1985).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoey, T., Levine, M. Divergent homeo box proteins recognize similar DNA sequences in Drosophila. Nature 332, 858–861 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1038/332858a0

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing