Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Factors controlling emission of dimethylsulphide from salt marshes

Abstract

The emission of biogenic sulphur gases constitutes about half the atmospheric budget for gaseous sulphur1. Since dimethylsulphide (DMS) was first implicated as a major component of gaseous sulphur flux2–4, considerable attention has been given to its emission from various ecosystems. Salt marshes have been identified as one system with a high area-specific sulphur emission5–13. Dimethylsulphide and hydrogen sulphide (H2S) constitute the bulk of the flux from salt marshes, with DMS predominating in vegetated areas of the marsh6,8–13. As H2S is a product of anaerobic decomposition in sediments, it has been assumed that other sulphur gases emitted from salt marshes also originate from decomposition in sediment processes5. Our research suggests an alternative explanation for DMS fluxes. We have investigated the distribution of DMS and dimethy Isulphoniopropionate (DMSP) in salt marshes and conclude that DMS arises primarily from physiological processes in leaves of higher plants, mainly one species of grass, Spartina alterniflora. Furthermore, the emission of DMS from this grass may be influenced by the technique used to measure emission, and emission from sites dominated by S. alterniflora cannot be considered to be representative of marsh flora.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. 1. Andreae, M. O. & Raemdonck, H. Science 221, 744-747 (1983). 2. Lovelock, J. E., Maggs, R. J. & Rasmussen, R. A. Nature 237, 452-453 (1972). 3. Liss, P. S. & Slater, P. G. Nature 247, 181-184 (1974). 4. Maroulis, P. J. & Bandy, A. R. Science 196, 647-648 (1977). 5. Hitchcock, D. Chemosphere 3, 137-138 (1975). 6. Adams, D. F., Harwell, S. O., Robinson, E., Pack, M. R. & Bamesberger, W. L. Envir. Sci. Technol. 15, 1439-1498 (1981). 7. Aneja, V. P., Aneja, A. P. & Adams, D. F. /. air Pollut. Control Ass. 32, 803-807 (1982). 8. Goldberg, A. B., Maroulis, P. J., Wilner, L. A. & Bandy, A. R. Atmos. Envir. 15,11-18 (1981). 9. Steudler, P. A. & Peterson, B. J. Nature 311, 455-457 (1984). 10. Steudler, P. A. & Peterson, B. J. Atmos. Envir. 19, 1411-1416 (1985). 11. Jorgensen, B. B. & Okholm-Hansen, B. Atmos. Envir. 11, 1737-1749 (1985). 12. Cooper, D. J. el al. Atmos. Envir. 21, 7-12 (1987). 13. de Mello, W. Z. el al. Atmos. Envir. 21, 987-990 (1987). 14. King, G. M., Howes, B. L. & Dacey, J. W. H. Geochim. cosmochim. Acta 49,1561-1566 (1986). 15. Howes, B. L., Dacey, J. W. H. & Wakeham, S. G. Limnol. Oceanogr. 30, 221-227 (1985). 16. Challenger, F. Aspects of the Organic Chemistry of Sulfur (Academic, New York, 1959). 17. Reed, R. H. Mar. Biol. Lett. 4, 173-181 (1983). 18. White, R. H. / mar. Res. 40, 529-536 (1982). 19. Larher, F., Hamelin, J. & Stewart, G. R. Phytochemistry 16, 2019-2020 (1977). 20. van Diggelen, J., Rozema, J., Dickson, D. M. J. & Broekman, R. New Phytol. 103, 573-586 (1986). 21. Wyn Jones, R. G. & Storey, R. in the Physiology and Biochemistry of Drought Resistant Plants (eds Paleg, L. G. & Aspinall, D.) 171-204 (Academic, Sydney, 1982). 22. Nriagu, J. O., Holdway, D. A. & Coker, R. D. Science 237, 1189-1192 (1987). 23. Andreae, M. O. & Andreae, T. W. J. geophys. Res. (in the press). 24. Vairavamurthy, A., Andreae, M. O. & Iverson, R. L. Limnol. Oceanogr. 30, 59-70 (1985). 25. Dacey, J. W. H. & Wakeham, S. G. Science 233, 1314-1316 (1986). 26. Winner, W. E. et al. Nature 289, 672-673 (1981).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dacey, J., King, G. & Wakeham, S. Factors controlling emission of dimethylsulphide from salt marshes. Nature 330, 643–645 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1038/330643a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/330643a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing