The current predicament of British science is but one consequence of a deep and widespread malaise. In response, scientists must reassert the pre-eminence of the concepts of objectivity and truth.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Pandemics, policy, and pluralism: A Feyerabend-inspired perspective on COVID-19
Synthese Open Access 26 October 2022
-
Science, Worldviews, and Education
Science & Education Open Access 16 November 2006
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Medawar, P.B. Induction and Intuition in Scientific Thought 11 (Methuen, London, 1969).
Williams, S. The Times 15 (27 February 1971).
The Public Understanding of Science (The Royal Society, London, 1985).
The Royal Society Corporate Plan: A Strategy for the Royal Society 1986–1996 (The Royal Society, London, 1986).
Porter, G. Supplement to Royal Society News 3, i–vi (1986).
Alexander, P. et al. Analysis 46, 161 (1986).
Lawson, H. The Listener 115, 12–13 (20 February 1986).
Popper, K.R. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge 4th edn 33–37 (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1972).
Popper, K.R. in Problems in the Philosophy of Science (eds Lakatos, I. & Musgrave, A.) 163–164 (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1968).
Lakatos, I. in The Problem of Inductive Logic (ed. Lakatos, I.) 397 (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1968).
Stove, D.C. Popper and After: Four Modern Irrationalists 16 (Pergamon, Oxford, 1982).
Kuhn, T.S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 2nd edn (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1970).
Wade, N. Science 197, 143–145 (1977).
Feyerabend, P. Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge 28 (New Left Books, London, 1975).
Broad, W.J. Science 206, 534–537 (1979).
Ross, W.D. (ed.) The Works of Aristotle Volume VI Opuscula 979a 11-980b 21 (Clarendon, Oxford, 1913).
Chalmers, A.F. What Is This Thing Called Science? An Assessment of the Nature and the Status of Science and its Methods 1st edn (University of Queensland Press, St Lucia, 1976); 2nd edn (Open University Press, Milton Keynes, 1982).
The Future of the Science Budget: The Government's Response to the Report from the Education, Science & Arts Committee Session 1984–1985 (Command 9849, HMSO, London, 1986).
Sharp Cook, C. Am. J. Phys. 48, 175–176 (1980).
Psimopoulos, M. & Theocharis, T. Am. J. Phys. 54, 969 (1986).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Theocharis, T., Psimopoulos, M. Where science has gone wrong. Nature 329, 595–598 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1038/329595a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/329595a0
This article is cited by
-
Pandemics, policy, and pluralism: A Feyerabend-inspired perspective on COVID-19
Synthese (2022)
-
Science and Religion in Conflict, Part 1: Preliminaries
Foundations of Science (2022)
-
Science, Worldviews, and Education
Science & Education (2009)
