Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A land-bridge island perspective on mammalian extinctions in western North American parks

Abstract

In recent years, a number of authors1–3 have suggested several geometric principles for the design of nature reserves based upon the hypothesis that nature reserves are analogous to land-bridge islands. Land-bridge islands are islands that were formerly connected to the mainland and were created by a rise in the level of the ocean. Land-bridge islands are considered supersaturated with species in that the ratio of island to mainland species numbers is higher than expected from the area of the island. As a result, the rate of extinction should exceed the rate of colonization on a land-bridge island, resulting in a loss of species that is suggested to be related to the size and degree of isolation of the island4If nature reserves are considered to be similar to land-bridge islands, because most are slowly becoming isolated from their surroundings by habitat disturbance outside the reserves4–8, several predictions follow. First, the total number of extinctions should exceed the total number of colonizations within a reserve; second, the number of extinctions should be inversely related to reserve size; and third, the number of extinctions should be directly related to reserve age. I report here that the natural post-establishment loss of mammalian species in 14 western North American national parks is consistent with these predictions of the land-bridge island hypothesis and that all but the largest western North American national parks are too small to retain an intact mammalian fauna.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. Diamond, J. M. Biol. Conserv. 7, 129–146 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Terborgh, J. in Tropical Ecological Systems: Trends in Terrestrial and Aquatic Research (eds Golley, F. B. & Medina, E.) 369–380 (Springer, New York, 1975).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Wilson, E. O. & Willis, E. O. in Ecology and Evolution of Communities (eds Cody, M. L. & Diamond, J. M.) 522–534 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Diamond, J. M. Proc natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 69, 3199–3203 (1972).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wright, G. M., Dixon, J. S. & Thompson, B. H. Fauna Series No. 1, Vol. 1 (US Govt Printing Office, Washington DC, 1932).

  6. Soulé, M. E., Wilcox, B. A. & Holtby, C. Biol. Conserv. 15, 259–272 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. National Park Service, State of the Parks - 1980; A Report to the Congress (US Dept of the Interior, Washington DC, 1980).

  8. Newmark, W. D. Biol. Conserv. 33, 197–208 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Runte, A. National Parks: The American Experience (University of Nebraska, Lincoln, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wilcox, B. A. in Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective (eds Soulé, M. E. & Wilcox, B. A.) 95–117 (Sinauer, Sunderland, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Terborgh, J. & Winter, B. in Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective (eds Soulé, M. E. & Wilcox, B. A.) 119–133 (Sinauer, Sunderland, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Diamond, J. M. in Extinctions (ed. Nitecki, M. H.) 191–246 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Newmark, W. D. Ph.D., thesis, Univ. Michigan (1986).

  14. Mader, H. J. Biol. Conserv. 29, 81–96 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Oxley, D. J., Fenton, M. D. & Carmondy, G. R. J. appl. Ecol. 11, 51–59 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pedersen, R. J. in Conf. Proc. Recreational Impact of Wildlands (eds Ittner, R., Potter, D. R., Agee, J. K. & Anshell, S.) 169–173 (US Forest Service, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wegner, J. F. & Merriam, G. J. appl. Ecol. 16, 349–357 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brown, J. H. & Kodrick-Brown, A. Ecology 58, 445–449 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kilgore, B. M. & Taylor, D. Ecology 60, 129–142 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Loope, L. L. & Gruell, G. E. Quat. Res. 3, 425–443 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McNeil, R. C. & Zobel, D. B. NW Sci. 54, 30–46 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vankat, J. L. & Major, J. J. Biogeogr. 5, 377–402 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Newmark, W. A land-bridge island perspective on mammalian extinctions in western North American parks. Nature 325, 430–432 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1038/325430a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/325430a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing