Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Post-translational insertion of fragment of the glucose transporter into microsomes requires phosphoanhydride bond cleavage

Abstract

Most eukaryotic secretory and membrane proteins insert co-translationally into the membrane of the rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER), and are targeted there by one or more NH2-terminal or internal signal sequences (for reviews see refs 1,2). However, little is known about the actual translocation and membrane integration processes. In particular, any energy requirements for targeting and integration have remained obscure because of the inability to uncouple the processes from concomitant protein synthesis. We recently showed that the human glucose transporter (GT), an integral membrane glycoprotein3, can insert post-translationally into dog pancreatic microsomes with low but demonstrable efficiency in vitro, and that a fragment corresponding to the NH2-terminal 340 amino acids and 8 of the 12 membrane-spanning α-helixes of GT (GT-N) can insert with significantly greater efficiency4. We report here that post-translational insertion of GT-N into pancreatic microsomes requires energy in the form of a phosphodiester bond, and suggest that co-translational insertion of proteins into the RER may also require energy independent of that used for polypeptide synthesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Walter, P., Gilmore, R. & Blobel, G. Cell 38, 5–8 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wickner, W. T. & Lodish, H. F. Science 230, 400–407 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mueckler, M. et al. Science 229, 941–945 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mueckler, M. & Lodish, H. F. Cell 44, 629–637 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bobel, G. & Dobberstein, B. J. Cell Biol. 67, 835–851 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Walter, P., Ibrahimi, I. & Blobel, G. J. Cell Biol. 91, 545–550 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Walter, P. & Blobel, G. J. Cell Biol. 91, 551–556 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Walter, P. & Blobel, G. J. Cell Biol. 91, 557–561 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gilmore, R., Blobel, G. & Walter, P. J. Cell Biol. 95, 463–469 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gilmore, R., Walter, P. & Blobel, G. J. Cell Biol. 95, 463–469 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gilmore, R. & Blobel, G. Cell 35, 677–685 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Meyer, D. I., Krause, E. & Dobberstein, B. Nature 297, 647–650 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Friendlander, M. & Blobel, G. Nature 318, 338–343 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Anderson, D. J., Mostov, K. E. & Blobel, G. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 80, 7249–7253 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Anderson, D. J., Walter, P. & Blobel, G. J. Cell Biol. 93, 501–506 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rottier, P., Armstrong, J. & Meyer, D. I. J. biol. Chem. 260, 4648–4656 (1985).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Spiess, M. & Lodish, H. F. Cell 44, 177–185 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gilmore, R. & Blobel, G. Cell 42, 497–505 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Engelman, D. M. & Steitz, T. A. Cell 23, 411–422 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hohnadel, D. C. & Cooper, C. Eur. J. Biochem. 31, 180–185 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Steck, T. L. & Yu, J. J. supramolec. Struct. 1, 220–232 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mostov, K. E., DeFoor, P., Fleischer, S. & Blobel, G. Nature 292, 87–88 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fujiki, Y., Fowler, S., Shio, H., Hubbard, A. & Lazarow, P. J. Cell Biol. 93, 103–110 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rothman, J. E., Katz, F. N. & Lodish, H. F. Cell 15, 1447–1454 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Das, R. C. & Heath, E. C. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 3811–3815 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bakker, E. P. & Randall, L. L. EMBO J. 3, 895–900 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gasser, S., Daum, G. & Schatz, G. J. biol. Chem. 257, 13034–13041 (1982).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Grossman, A., Bartlett, S. & Chua, N.-H. Nature 285, 625–628 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Walter, P. & Blobel, G. Meth. Enzym. 96, 682–691 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Laemmli, U. K. Nature 227, 680–685 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mueckler, M., Lodish, H. Post-translational insertion of fragment of the glucose transporter into microsomes requires phosphoanhydride bond cleavage. Nature 322, 549–552 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/322549a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/322549a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing