Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Is QSO1146+111B,C due to lensing by a cosmic string?

Abstract

A predicted consequence of cosmic strings is that they should produce equal-brightness double-lens images of distant quasars (QSOs), with separations of up to several minutes of arc (see refs 1, 2). Here I discuss a newly discovered lens candidate3–6: QSO1146+111B,C which appears to consist of two images of equal brightness (B is 1.02 times as bright as C, with virtually identical spectra over the observed range) of a quasar at redshift z = 1.01, which are separated by 2.6 arc min. If this is produced by a cosmic string, its mass per unit length is µ4.0×1023 g cm−1, a value large enough to be interesting for string-assisted galaxy formation7–9 and near the upper limits implied by the isotropy of the cosmic microwave background2,10 and constraints on gravitational radiation11. But note that four other QSOs, also close enough to be double-imaged, have thus far not been detected. Searches for these and for the microwave background temperature shift across the string2,10 would be useful.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vilenkin, A. Phys. Rev. D23, 852–857 (1981).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gott, J. R. Astrophys. J. 288, 422–427 (1985).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Hazard, C., Arp, H. & Morton, D. C. Nature 282, 271–272 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Arp, H. & Hazard, C. Astrophys. J. 240, 726–736 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Paczynski, B. Nature 319, 567–568 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Turner, E. L. et al. Nature 321, 142–144 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zeldovich, Ya. B. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 192, 663–667 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vilenkin, A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 1169–1172 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Turok, N. & Schramm, D. N. Nature 312, 598–599 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaiser, N. & Stebbins, A. Nature 310, 391–393 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hogan, C. & Rees, M. Nature 311, 109–114 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Turok, N. Phys. Lett. 123B, 387–390 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gott, J. R. & Gunn, J. E. Astrophys. J. Lett 190, L105–L108 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Turner, E. L., Ostriker, J. P. & Gott, J. R. Astrophys. J. 284, 1–22 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gott, J. Is QSO1146+111B,C due to lensing by a cosmic string?. Nature 321, 420–421 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/321420a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/321420a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing