Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Observation of an unexplained event from a magnetic monopole detector

Abstract

A single event was recorded by our 0.18 m2 inductive magnetic monopole detector, in a total effective observation time of 8,242 hours. None of the monitoring channels that record vibration, radiofrequency interference, and so on, indicated any extraneous cause for this event. An astrophysical estimate of the maximum number flux of monopoles suggests that the chances of a monopole having caused the event are less than 1 in 103. Alternative explanations for the candidate are considered, but none of them seem likely.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dirac, P. A. M. Proc. R. Soc. A133, 60–72 (1931).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Groom, D. E. Phys. Rep. (in the press).

  3. Guth, A. H. Phys. Rev. D 23, 347–356 (1981).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cabrera, B. Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1378–1381 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Turner, M. S., Parker, E. N. & Bogdan, T. J. Phys. Rev. D 26, 1296–1302 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wasserman, I., Shapiro, S. L. & Farouki, R. Commts Astrophys. 10, 257–265 (1985).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cabrera, B., Taber, M., Gardner, R. & Bourg, J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1933–1966 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Incandela, J. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2067–2070 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Caplin, A. D., Guy, C. N., Hardiman, M., Park, J. G. & Schouten, J. C. Nature 317, 234–236 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bermon, S. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1850–1853 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schouten, J. C. et al. J. Phys. E. (submitted).

  12. Kim, Y. C., Hempstead, C. F. & Strnad, A. R. Phys. Rev. Lett. 9, 306–309 (1962).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fickett, F. R., Cromar, M. & Clarke, A. F. in Monopole 83 (ed. Stone, J. L.) 477–484 (Plenum, New York, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ziegler, J. F. & Lanford, W. A. J. appl. Phys. 52, 4305–4312 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nicholls, D. K., Price, W. E. & Andrews, J. L. IEEE Trans. nucl. Sci. 29, 2081–2084 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ziegler, J. F. et al. Phys. Rev. D28, 1793–1795 (1983).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Magno, R., Nisenoff, M., Shelby, R., Kidd, J. & Campbell, A. B. IEEE Trans. nucl. Sci. 29, 2090–2094 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caplin, A., Hardiman, M., Koratzinos, M. et al. Observation of an unexplained event from a magnetic monopole detector. Nature 321, 402–406 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/321402a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/321402a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing