Letter | Published:

A mutated polyoma virus enhancer which is active in undifferentiated embryonal carcinoma cells is not repressed by adenovirus-2 E1A products

Nature volume 321, pages 249251 (15 May 1986) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

Enhancers stimulate transcription of several eukaryotic genes (for review see ref. 1). While some enhancers, like that of simian virus 40 (SV40), are active in a wide range of cell types, others are more cell-specific1. For example, the polyoma virus (Py) enhancer is not active in undifferentiated embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells, such as F9 cells, while it is active in differentiated cells2,3. In contrast, the SV40 enhancer is active in both undifferentiated and differentiated EC cells4. One possible explanation for this difference is that the two viral enhancers interact with different positively or negatively acting transcription factors, a notion supported by in vitro experiments showing that the Py enhancer interacts with proteins that do not bind to the SV40 enhancer5,6. Some viral7,8 and cellular9 enhancers, including the Py and SV40 enhancers, can be negatively regulated by the products of the E1A transcription unit of adenovirus-2. As it has been postulated that undifferentiated F9 cells contain an E1A-like activity10, it is possible that the latter is responsible for the lack of activity of the Py enhancer in these cells. We show here that the E1A products do not repress a point mutant of the Py enhancer (Py ECF9.1; ref. 11 and references therein) that is active in undifferentiated F9 cells3. This result is consistent with the idea that undifferentiated F9 cells contain a cellular represser that blocks the Py enhancer and that this represser has the same target sequence as the E1A proteins.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , & Trends Genet. 1, 224–230 (1985).

  2. 2.

    & Cell 35, 693–699 (1983).

  3. 3.

    , & Cell 39, 653–662 (1984).

  4. 4.

    , & Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 50, 747–752 (1985).

  5. 5.

    , & Nature 313, 458–463 (1985).

  6. 6.

    , & EMBO J. 4, 2675–2685 (1985).

  7. 7.

    , & Nature 312, 608–612 (1984).

  8. 8.

    & Cell 40, 705–716 (1985).

  9. 9.

    , & Science 230, 1391–1394 (1985).

  10. 10.

    , , , & Molec. cell. Biol. 4, 867–874 (1984).

  11. 11.

    et al. EMBO J. 4, 1799–1803 (1985).

  12. 12.

    et al. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81, 4183–4185 (1984).

  13. 13.

    , , , & Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. (in the press).

  14. 14.

    , & Cell 42, 519–526 (1985).

  15. 15.

    , & Nucleic Acids Res. (submitted).

  16. 16.

    , , & Molec. cell. Biol. 5, 628–633 (1985).

  17. 17.

    , & Science 206, 337–344 (1979).

  18. 18.

    et al. EMBO J. 5, 387–397 (1986).

  19. 19.

    & Nucleic Acids Res. 9, 6251–6264 (1981).

  20. 20.

    & Molec. cell. Biol. 4, 2929–2931 (1984).

  21. 21.

    , , & Nucleic Acids Res. 13, 711–726 (1985).

  22. 22.

    , , , & Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79, 7132–7136 (1982).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire des Eucaryotes du CNRS, Unité 184 de Biologie Moléculaire et de Génie Génétique de l'INSERM, Faculté de Médecine, 11 rue Humann, 67085 Strasbourg Cedex, France

    • R. Hen
    • , E. Borrelli
    • , C. Fromental
    • , P. Sassone-Corsi
    •  & P. Chambon

Authors

  1. Search for R. Hen in:

  2. Search for E. Borrelli in:

  3. Search for C. Fromental in:

  4. Search for P. Sassone-Corsi in:

  5. Search for P. Chambon in:

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/321249a0

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.