Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

A comparison of inhibition in orientation and spatial frequency selectivity of cat visual cortex

Abstract

Neurones in the visual cortex are highly selective for orientation1 and spatial frequency2,3 of visual stimuli. There is strong neurophy-siological evidence that orientation selectivity is enhanced by inhibitory interconnections between columns in the cortex which have different orientation sensitivities4–6, an idea which is supported by experiments using neuropharmacological manipulation7,8 or complex visual stimuli6. It has also been proposed that selectivity for spatial frequency is mediated in part by a similar mechanism to that for orientation, although evidence for this is based on special use of visual stimuli, which hampers interpretation of the findings9,10. We have therefore examined selectivity for both orientation and spatial frequency using a technique which allows direct inferences about inhibitory processes. Our method uses microiontophoresis of an excitatory amino acid to elevate maintained discharge of single neurones in the visual cortex. We then present visual stimuli both within and outside the range of orientations and spatial frequencies which cause a cell to respond with increased discharge. Our results show that orientations presented on either side of the responsive range usually produce clear suppression of maintained discharge. In marked contrast, spatial frequencies shown to either side of the responsive range have little or no effect on maintained activity. We conclude that there is an intracortical organization of inhibitory connections between cells tuned to different orientations but not different spatial frequencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hubel, D. H. & Wiesel, T. N. J. Physiol., Land. 160, 106–154 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Campbell, F. W., Cooper, G. F. & Enroth-Cugell, C. J. Physiol., Lond. 203, 223–235 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Maffei, L. & Fiorentini, A. Vision Res. 16, 1255–1267 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Benevento, L. A., Creutzfeldt, O. D. & Kuhnt, V. Nature new Biol. 238, 124–126 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Creutzfeldt, O. D., Kuhnt, U. & Benevento, L. A. Expl Brain Res. 21, 251–274 (1974).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Morrone, M. C., Burr, D. C. & Maffei, L. Proc. R. Soc. B216, 335–354 (1982).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sillito, A. M. J. Physiol., Lond. 250, 305–329 (1975); 289, 33–53 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sillito, A. M., Kemp, A., Milson, J. A. & Berardi, N. Brain Res. 194, 517–520 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. DeValois, K. K. & Tootell, R. B. H. J. Physiol., Lond. 336, 359–376 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bonds, A. B. Invest. Ophthal. vis. Sci. 24, 229 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ramoa, A. S., Freeman, R. D. & Macy, A. J. Neurophysiol. 54, 61–72 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hubel, D. H. & Wiesel, T. N. J. Neurophysiol. 28, 229–289 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gilbert, C. D. J. Physiol., Lond. 268, 391–421 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pettigrew, J. D., Nikara, T. & Bishop, P. O. Expl Brain Res. 6, 373–390 (1968).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramoa, A., Shadlen, M., Skottun, B. et al. A comparison of inhibition in orientation and spatial frequency selectivity of cat visual cortex. Nature 321, 237–239 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/321237a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/321237a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing