Abstract
If the Sun were to contain even a minute mass fraction of weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs), there could be a significant influence on its central thermal structure. In particular, a relative concentration as small as ∼10−11 by number may lower the central temperature sufficiently to bring the predicted electron neutrino detection rate into agreement with observation1–6. Helioseismology7,8 provides a means for an independent test of the validity of this and other proposed resolutions of the solar neutrino problem. Theoretically, it is the low-degree g modes that are most sensitive to conditions in the core, the only region where substantial deviations from so-called standard solar models occur. Indeed, solar models with WIMPs have a g-mode period spacing that is markedly different from that of other solar models. Therefore g-mode observations hold the promise of a sensitive test, although unfortunately their current interpretation is fraught with difficulties. The best test currently available involves instead the frequency separation of low-degree p modes with like (n+½l) (where n and l are respectively the order and degree of the mode). Standard solar models produce p-mode separations somewhat larger than those observed. Conventional attempts to resolve the solar neutrino problem9,10 make the situation worse; in some cases, grossly so. We show that, in contrast, a relevant WIMP model predicts p-mode separations that are reduced by ∼10%; this is consistent with the observations.
Access options
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
$199.00
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
from$8.99
All prices are NET prices.
References
- 1
Steigman, G., Sarazin, C. L., Quintana, H. & Faulkner, J. Astr. J. 83, 1050–1061 (1978).
- 2
Faulkner, J. & Gilliland, R. L. Astrophys. J. 299, 994–1000 (1985).
- 3
Gilliland, R. L., Faulkner, J., Press, W. H. & Spergel, D. N. Astrophys. J. (in the press).
- 4
Spergel, D. N. & Press, W. H. Astrophys. J. 294, 663–673 (1985).
- 5
Press, W. H. & Spergel, D. N. Astrophys. J. 296, 679–684 (1985).
- 6
Krauss, L. M., Freese, K., Spergel, D. N. & Press, W. H. Astrophys. J. 299, 1001–1006 (1985).
- 7
Gough, D. O. Adv. Space Res. 4, 85–102 (1984).
- 8
Gough, D. O. in Solar Physics and Interplanetary Travelling Phenomena (eds Chen Baio & de Jager, C.) (Yunnan Observatory, Kunming, 1985).
- 9
Iben, I. Ann. Phys. 54, 164–203 (1969).
- 10
Schatzman, E., Maeder, A., Angrand, F. & Glowinski, R. Astr. Astrophys. 96, 1–16 (1981).
- 11
Cleveland, B. T., Davis, R. & Rowley, J. K. in Resonance Ionization Spectroscopy 1984 (eds Hurst, G. S. & Payne, M. G.) 241–261 (Institute of Physics Conf. Ser. 71, Bristol, (1984).
- 12
Gabriel, G. Astr. Astrophys. 134, 387–389 (1984).
- 13
Claverie, A. et al. Nature 293, 443–445 (1981).
- 14
Grec, G., Fossat, E. & Pomerantz, M. Sol. Phys. 82, 55–66 (1983).
- 15
Woodard, M. & Hudson, H. S. Nature 305, 589–593 (1983).
- 16
Harvey, J. W. & Duvall, T. L. Jr in Solar Seismology from Space (eds Ulrich, R. K. et al..) 165–172 (Jet Propulsion Lab. Publ. 84–84, Pasadena, 1984).
- 17
Gough, D. O. Phys. Bull. 34, 502–507 (1983).
- 18
Abraham, Z. & Iben, I. Astrophys. J. 170, 157–163 (1971).
- 19
Bahcall, J. N. & Ulrich, R. K. Astrophys. J. 170, 593–603 (1971).
- 20
Joss, P. Astrophys. J. 191, 771–774 (1974).
- 21
Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Gough, D. O. & Morgan, J. G. Astr. Astrophys. 73, 131–128; 79, 260 (1979).
- 22
Tassoul, M. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 43, 469–490 (1980).
- 23
Christensen-Dalsgaard, J. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 199, 735–736 (1982).
- 24
Faulkner, J. thesis, Univ. Cambridge (1964).
- 25
Faulkner, J. Astrophys. J. 144, 978–994 (1966).
- 26
Christensen-Dalsgaard, J. et al. Nature 315, 378–382 (1985).
- 27
Ulrich, R. K. & Rhodes, E. Jr. Astrophys. J. 265, 551–563 (1983).
- 28
Vandakurov, Yu, V. Astr. Zh. 44, 786–797 (1967).
- 29
Zahn, J.-P. Astr. Astrophys. 4, 452–461 (1970).
- 30
Deubner, F.-L. & Gough, D. O. A. Rev. Astr. Astrophys. 22, 593–619 (1984).
- 31
Berthomieu, G., Provost, J. & Schatzman, E. Nature 308, 254–257 (1984).
- 32
Christensen-Dalsgaard, J. in Seismology of the Sun and the Distant Stars (ed. Gough, D. O.), 23–53 (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986).
- 33
Cox, A. N. & Kidman, R. B. Theoretical Problems in Stellar Stability and Oscillations (eds Noels, A. & Gabriel, M.) 259–262 (Institute d'Astrophysique, Liège, 1984).
- 34
Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Däppen, W. & Gilliland, R. L. Nature this issue (1986).
- 35
Shibahashi, H., Gabriel, M. & Noels, A. Astr. Astrophys. 123, 283–288 (1983).
- 36
Ulrich, R. K. & Rhodes, E. J. Jr in Solar Seismology from Space (eds Ulrich, R. K. et al.) 371–377 (Jet Propulsion Lab. Publ. 84–84, Pasadena, (1984).
- 37
Bahcall, J. N. Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 251–254 (1969).
Author information
Affiliations
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Bombay, 400 005, India
- John Faulkner
- , D. O. Gough
- & M. N. Vahia
Lick Observatory, University of California, Santa Cruz, California, 95064, USA
- John Faulkner
- & D. O. Gough
Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, UK
- John Faulkner
- & D. O. Gough
Authors
Search for John Faulkner in:
Search for D. O. Gough in:
Search for M. N. Vahia in:
Rights and permissions
To obtain permission to re-use content from this article visit RightsLink.
About this article
Further reading
-
What Have We Learned from Helioseismology, What Have We Really Learned, and What Do We Aspire to Learn?
Solar Physics (2013)
-
Constrained estimates of low-degree mode frequencies and the determination of the interior structure of the Sun
Solar Physics (1995)
-
Solar oscillations and the equation of state
The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review (1992)
-
The origin and abundances of the chemical elements revisited
The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review (1991)
-
Evidence from solar seismology against non-standard solar-core models
Nature (1990)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.