Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Equivalence of intracellular pH of differentiating Dictyostelium cell types

Abstract

During the development of the cellular slime moulds, spore and stalk cells arise from vegetative amoebae. The intracellular pH (pHi) of the developing cells has been postulated to be important in the choice of morphogenetic programmes1. This hypothesis stems from the observation that the addition to the culture medium of weak (membrane-permeable) acids or bases favours the differentiation of pre-stalk or pre-spore cells respectively1–3. Similarly, compounds that are known to inhibit a Dictyostelium plasma membrane proton pump induce preferential pre-stalk development1,4,5; and a stalk-specific Dictyostelium morphogen, ‘DIF’, has been suggested to act via intracellular acidification6,7. However, in these studies the pHi values of pre-spore and pre-stalk amoebae were unknown, and the actual effects of the various agents mentioned above on pHi were also unknown. By monitoring the intracellular fluorescence of a pH-sensitive dye, I have measured the relative intracellular pH of pre-spore compared with pre-stalk amoebae. I report here that, contrary to the above hypothesis, there is no significant difference in the pHi of the two cell types.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gross, J. D., Bradbury, J., Kay, R. R. & Peacy, M. J. Nature 303, 244–245 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Town, C. D. Differentiation 27, 29–35 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gross, J. D. et al. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B295, 497–508 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pogge van Strandmann, R., Kay, R. R. & Dufour, J. P. FEBS Lett. 175, 422–442 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Serrano, R., Cano, A. & Pestana, A. Biochim. biophys. Acta 812, 553–560 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kay, R. R. & Jermyn, K. A. Nature 303, 242–244 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kopachik, W. J., Dhokia, B. & Kay, R. R. Differentiation 28, 209–216 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jentoft, J. & Town, C. J. Cell Biol. 101, 778–784 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Satre, M. & Martin, J. B. Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun. 132, 140–146 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kay, R. R., Gadian, D. G. & Williams, S. R. J. Cell Sci. (in the press).

  11. Jamieson, G. Jr, Frazier, W. & Schlesinger, P. J. Cell Biol. 99, 1883–1887 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ohkuma, S. & Poole, B. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75, 3327–3331 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Thomas, J. A., Kolbeck, P. C. & Langworthy, T. A. in Intracellular pH: Its Measurement, Regulation and Utilization in Cellular Functions (eds Nuccitelli, R. & Deamer, D. W.) 105–123 (Liss, New York, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kelly, P. J., Kelleher, J. K. & Wright, B. Biochem. J. 184, 581–588 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gregg, J. & Karp, G. Expl Cell Res. 112, 31–46 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tasaka, M. & Takeuchi, I. Differentiation 23, 184–188 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Devine, K. M. & Loomis, W. F. Devl Biol. 107, 364–372 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Watts, D. J. & Ashworth, J. M. Biochem. J. 119, 171–174 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ratner, D. I. & Borth, W. Expl Cell Res. 143, 1–13 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ratner, D. Equivalence of intracellular pH of differentiating Dictyostelium cell types. Nature 321, 180–182 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/321180a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/321180a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing