Abstract
When we reach towards an object that suddenly appears in our peripheral visual field, not only does our arm extend towards the object, but our eyes, head and body also move in such a way that the image of the object falls on the fovea. Popular models of how reaching movements are programmed1,2 have argued that while the first part of the limb movement is ballistic, subsequent corrections to the trajectory are made on the basis of dynamic feedback about the relative positions of the hand and the target provided by central vision. These models have assumed that the adjustments are dependent on seeing the hand moving with respect to the target. Here we present evidence that a change in the position of a visual target during a reaching movement can modify the trajectory even when vision of the hand is prevented. Moreover, these dynamic corrections to the trajectory of the moving limb occur without the subject perceiving the change in target location. These findings demonstrate that (1) visual feedback about the relative position of the hand and target is not necessary for visually driven corrections in reaching to occur, and (2) the mechanisms that maintain the apparent stability of a target in space are dissociable from those that mediate the visuomotor outputdirected at that target.
This is a preview of subscription content
Access options
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
204,58 €
only 4,01 € per issue
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
$32.00
All prices are NET prices.
References
Keele, S. W. in Handbook of Physiology. The Nervous System. Vol. 2 (ed. Brooks, V.) 1391–1414 (American Physiological Society, Baltimore, 1981).
Paillard, J. in Analysis of Visual Behavior (eds Ingle, D., Goodale, M. A. & Mansfield, R. M.) 367–385 (MIT Press, 1982).
Bauer, J. A. Jr, Woods, G. D. & Held, R. A device for rapid recording of positioning responses in two dimensions, Behavioral Research Methods and Instrumentaion 1, 157–159 (1969).
Bridgeman, B., Lewis, S., Heit, G. & Nagle, M. J. exp. Psychol., hum. Percept. Perform. 5, 692–700 (1979).
Perenin, M. T. & Jeannerod, M. Neuropsychology 16, 1–13 (1978).
Weiskrantz, L., Warrington, E., Sanders, M. D. & Marshall, J. Brain 97, 709–728 (1974).
Henson, D. B. Vision Res. 18, 63–67 (1978).
Author information
Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goodale, M., Pelisson, D. & Prablanc, C. Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature 320, 748–750 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/320748a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/320748a0
Further reading
-
The influences of target size and recent experience on the vigour of adjustments to ongoing movements
Experimental Brain Research (2022)
-
Entity Realism About Mental Representations
Erkenntnis (2022)
-
Cortex-dependent corrections as the tongue reaches for and misses targets
Nature (2021)
-
A Hierarchical Attractor Network Model of perceptual versus intentional decision updates
Nature Communications (2021)
-
The relationship between the implicit visuomotor control and the motor planning accuracy
Experimental Brain Research (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.