Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

New upper bound on the flux of cosmic magnetic monopoles

Abstract

Grand unification theories (GUTs) suggest that massive magnetic monopoles (mass 1016 GeV) were created in the very early stages of the formation of the Universe. The report, 3 years ago1, of a candidate cosmic magnetic monopole therefore stimulated intense experimental and theoretical activity2,3. These monopoles should have the magnetic charge h/e predicted by Dirac4, or perhaps small integer multiples of h/e, but zero electric charge. Surviving magnetic monopoles are thought to be moving so slowly, v/c = 10−3 or less, that they interact exceedingly weakly with matter. For this reason, conventional particle detectors (whose mechanism is electronic ionization or excitation) are expected to be rather insensitive5, so that inductive detectors are particularly attractive. We describe here the results of 6 months observation with a large inductive detector. Some putative events have been seen, but none of them seem to have been induced by a monopole. Our total exposure (detector area–time product) is now about 230 times that of Cabrera's first experiment, so that it seems increasingly likely that his original candidate event was spurious.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cabrera, B. Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1378–1381 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Carrigan, R. A. Jr & Trower, W. P. (eds) Magnetic Monopoles (Plenum, New York, 1983).

  3. Stone, J. L. (ed.) Monopole ‘83’ (Plenum, New York, 1984).

  4. Dirac, P. A. M. Proc. R. Soc. A133, 60–72 (1931).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ahlen, S. P. in Monopole ‘83’ (ed. Stone, J. L.) 629–635 (Plenum, New York, 1984).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Parker, E. N. in Monopole ‘83’ (ed. Stone, J. L.) 125–136 (Plenum, New York, 1984).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Park, J. G. & Guy, C. N. in Magnetic Monopoles (eds Carrigan, R. A. Jr & Trower, W. P.) 208–211 (Plenum, New York, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guy, C. N. in Monopole ‘83’ (ed. Stone, J. L.) 125–136 (Plenum, New York, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Incandela, J. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2067–2070 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gardner, R., Cabrera, B., Taber, M. & Huber, M. Proc. 17th int. Conf. on Low Temperature Physics 945–946 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tesche, C. D., Chi, C. C., Tsuei, C. C. & Chaudhari, P. Appl. phys. Lett. 43, 384–386 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schouten, J. C. et al. J. Phys. E. (submitted).

  13. Cabrera, B., Taber, M., Gardner, R. & Bourg, J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1933–1966 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caplin, A., Guy, C., Hardiman, M. et al. New upper bound on the flux of cosmic magnetic monopoles. Nature 317, 234–236 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1038/317234a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/317234a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing