Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Re-dating the English art-historical tree-ring chronologies

Abstract

Precisely dated oak (Quercus petraea Liebl. and Q. robur L. and their hybrids) tree-ring chronologies that show consistent cross-dating from Germany to England to Ireland1,2 have been labelled Type H3. In contrast, there have been difficulties in specifying the exact date ranges of some oak chronologies (termed Type A)3 constructed from art-historical timbers in England4,5 and the Netherlands6,7. It has been asserted that the oak planks and boards used in the English art-historical chronologies derived from England and Flanders3,8. The failure of these chronologies to date uniquely against Type H chronologies from the British Isles has led to suggestions that the timbers were imports, probably from the Baltic area1,9, views supported by historical evidence10,11. It has also been suggested that the dating procedure used for these chronologies has an element of circularity which could result in an erroneous placement of the chronologies going undetected12. Evidence is presented here which indicates that the art-historical chronologies have been incorrectly dated, that they represent imports into England and Flanders and that failure to take account of exotic origins has led to the use of unsuitable estimates for missing sapwood.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baillie, M. G. L. Tree-Ring Dating and Archaeology (Croom-Helm, London, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baillie, M. G. L., Pilcher, J. R. & Pearson, G. W. Radiocarbon 25, 171–178 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fletcher, J. M. Br. archaeol. Rep. (Int. Ser.) 51, 139–156 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fletcher, J. M., Tapper, M. C. & Walker, F. S. Archaeometry 16, 31–40 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fletcher, J. M. J. archaeol. Sci. 4, 335–352 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eckstein, D., Brongers, J. A. & Bauch, J. Tree-Ring Bull. 35, 1–13 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bauch, J. Br. archaeol. Rep. (Int. Ser.) 51, 133–137 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fletcher, J. M. Vem. Archit. 11, 32–38 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Baillie, M. G. L. Br. archaeol. Rep. (Br. Ser.) 51, 27–37 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rackham, O. Ancient Woodlands (Arnold, London, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rackham, O. Br. archaeol. Rep. (Int. Ser.) 129, 199–218 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Baillie, M. G. L. J. archaeol. Sci. 11, 371–393 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fletcher, J. M. Nature 254, 506–507 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fletcher, J. M. Proc. 22nd Symp. Archaeometry (eds Aspinall, A. & Warren, S. E.) 83–87 (University of Bradford, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fletcher, J. M. Proc. R. Inst. Gr. Br. 52, 81–104 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fletcher, J. M. & Tapper, M. C. Mediev. Archaeol. 28, 112–132 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Delorme, A. thesis, Univ. Göttingen (1972).

  18. Baillie, M. G. L. & Pilcher, J. R. Tree-Ring Bull. 33, 7–14 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hollstein, E. Bonn. Jb. 165, 12–27 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Becker, B. Fundberichte aus Baden-Württemberg 6, 369–386 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Eckstein, D., Mathieu, K. & Bauch, J. Verh. Naturwiss. Ver. Hamburg 16, 73–100 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Baillie, M. G. L. Tree-Ring Bull. 37, 1–12 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Baillie, M. G. L. Tree-Ring Bull. 37, 33–44 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Siebenlist Kerner, V. Br. archaeol. Rep. (Int. Ser.) 51, 157–161 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Morgan, R. A. Vern. Archit. 8, 809–814 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Baillie, M. G. L. Tree-Ring Bull. 37, 13–20 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tapper, M., Fletcher, J. M. & Walker, F. Br. archaeol. Rep. (Int. Ser.) 51, 339–342 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hughes, M. J., Milsom, S. J. & Leggett, P. A. J. archaeol. Sci. 8, 381–390 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hollstein, E. MittelEuropäische Eichenchronologie (von Zabern, Mainz am Rhein, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Becker, B. Fundberichte aus Baden-Württemberg 1, 545–564 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fletcher, J. M. Br. archaeol. Rep. (Int. Ser.) 51, 303–306 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baillie, M., Hillam, J., Briffa, K. et al. Re-dating the English art-historical tree-ring chronologies. Nature 315, 317–319 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1038/315317a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/315317a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing