Letter | Published:

A king-sized theropod coprolite

Nature volume 393, pages 680682 (18 June 1998) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

Fossil faeces (coprolites) provide unique trophic perspectives on ancient ecosystems. Yet, although thousands of coprolites have been discovered, specimens that can be unequivocally attributed to carnivorous dinosaurs are almost unknown. A few fossil faeces have been ascribed to herbivorous dinosaurs1,2,3, but it is more difficult to identify coprolites produced by theropods because other carnivorous taxa coexisted with dinosaurs and most faeces are taxonomically ambiguous. Thus sizeable (up to 20 cm long and 10 cm wide) phosphatic coprolites from Belgium4 and India5,6 that have been attributed to dinosaurs might have been produced by contemporaneous crocodylians7 or fish. But there is no ambiguity about the theropod origin of the Cretaceous coprolite we report here. This specimen is more than twice as large as any previously reported carnivore coprolite, and its great size and temporal and geographic context indicate that it was produced by a tyrannosaur, most likely Tyrannosaurus rex. The specimen contains a high proportion (30–50%) of bone fragments, and is rare tangible evidence of theropod diet and digestive processes.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Coprolites of Ptiliophyllum cuticles from the Middle Jurassic of North Yorkshire. Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. 27, 289–294 (1976).

  2. 2.

    7amp; Dinosaurs, dung beetles, and conifers: participants in a Cretaceous food web. Palaios 11, 280–285 (1996).

  3. 3.

    7amp; Probable herbivore coprolites from the Upper Jurassic Mygatt-Moore Quarry, Western Colorado. Mod. Geol. 23, 249–276 (1998).

  4. 4.

    Les Coprolithes de Bernissart. I. partie: Les Coprolithes qui ont ete attribues aux Iguanodons. Royal Musee Hist. Nat. Belgique Mem. 1, 1–154 (1903).

  5. 5.

    The coprolites of Pijdura, Central Provinces. Geol. Surv. Recs. 74, 535–547 (1939).

  6. 6.

    in Dinosaur Tracks and Traces (eds Gillette, D. D. 7amp; Lockley, M. G.) 99–108 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, (1989)).

  7. 7.

    Diskussion zu den Vorträgen R. Kräusel and F. Versluys. Palaeontologische Zeitschrift 4, 87 (1922).

  8. 8.

    in Canadian Paleontology Conference Field Trip Guidebook No. 6 (ed. McKenzie-McAnally, L.) 34–44 (Geol. Assoc. Canada, St John's, Newfoundland, (1997)).

  9. 9.

    , 7amp; in The Palaeobiology of Trace Fossils (ed. Donovan, S. K.) 221–240 (Wiley, Chichester, (1994)).

  10. 10.

    Sedimentary Petrology, Origin and Mining History of the Phosphate Rocks of Klein Curacao, Curacao and Aruba, Netherlands West Indies No. 130, 207 (Pub. Found. Sci. Res. Caribbean Region, (1991)).

  11. 11.

    , 7amp; Body mass, bone “strength indicator”, and cursorial potential of Tyrannosaurus rex. J. Vert. Paleontol. 15, 713–725 (1995).

  12. 12.

    Implications of body-mass estimates for dinosaurs. J. Vert. Paleontol. 14, 520–533 (1994).

  13. 13.

    , , 7amp; Gastric digestion in some raptors. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 50, 649–659 (1975).

  14. 14.

    Crocodilian scatology, microvertebrate concentrations, and enamel-less teeth. Paleobiology 7, 262–275 (1981).

  15. 15.

    Owls, Caves and Fossils 231 (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, (1990)).

  16. 16.

    , 7amp; Experimental taphonomy; preliminary results of the digestion of micromammal bones in the laboratory. Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci. 321, 803–809 (1995).

  17. 17.

    Dinosaurs, mammals and Mesozoic taphonomy. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 28, 209–213 (1983).

  18. 18.

    Phanerozoic trends in nonmarine taphonomy: implications for Mesozoic vertebrate taphonomy and paleoecology. Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. 19, 171 (1987).

  19. 19.

    7amp; in Taphonomy: Releasing the Data Locked in the Fossil Record (eds Allison, P. A. 7amp; Briggs, D. E. G.) 389–409 (Plenum, New York, (1991)).

  20. 20.

    in Morphology and Biology of Reptiles (eds Bellairs, A. d'A. 7amp; Cox, C. B.) 123–150 (Academic, London, (1976)).

  21. 21.

    Zonal “grown rings” in dinosaurs. Mod. Geol. 15, 19–48 (1990).

  22. 22.

    , 7amp; Long-bone circumference and weight in mammals, birds and dinosaurs. J. Zool. A 207, 53–61 (1985).

  23. 23.

    7amp; Comparative Physiology of the Vertebrate Digestive System 2nd edn, 400 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, (1995)).

  24. 24.

    The Behavioral Ecology of the Komodo Monitor 406 (Univ. Presses of Florida, Gainesville, (1981)).

  25. 25.

    Prey bone utilization by predatory dinosaurs. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 88, 157–166 (1991).

  26. 26.

    Aconsideration of the trophic dynamics of a Late Cretaceous large-dinosaur community (Oldman Formation). Ecology 57, 841–857 (1976).

  27. 27.

    , , 7amp; Size shape and serration density of theropod dinosaur lateral teeth. Mod. Geol. 16, 161–198 (1991).

  28. 28.

    Bite-force estimation for Tyrannosaurus rex from tooth-marked bones. Nature 382, 706–708 (1996).

  29. 29.

    7amp; Bite marks attributable to Tyrannosaurus rex: preliminary description and implications. J. Vert. Paleontol. 16, 175–178 (1996).

  30. 30.

    , 7amp; Major and trace element analyses of rocks and minerals by automated X-ray spectrometry (Washington State Univ., Geol. Dept, Open File Report, (1993)).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank W. Sloboda for the discovery of the coprolite; the Allemand family for permitting access to the land and its fossils; H. N. Bryant, M. J. Jurashius, C. E. Meyer, M. Moreno, R. L. Oscarson, J. F. Parham, D. Pierce, J. Rifkin and B. H. Tiffney for comments and technical assistance; the Royal Saskatchewan Museum, Stanford University, the US Geological Survey, and the University of California at Santa Barbara for technical and administrative assistance; and the late W. V. Sliter for support and encouragement.

Author information

Author notes

    • Gregory M. Erickson

    Present address: Biomechanical Engineering Division, Mechanical Engineering Department

Affiliations

  1. United States Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, MS 975, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA

    • Karen Chin
    •  & Lewis C. Calk
  2. *Eastend Fossil Research Station, Royal Saskatchewan Museum, Box 460, Eastend, Saskatchewan S0N 0T0, Canada

    • Timothy T. Tokaryk
  3. †Department of Integrative Biology & Museums of Vertebrate Zoology and Paleontology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA

    • Gregory M. Erickson

Authors

  1. Search for Karen Chin in:

  2. Search for Timothy T. Tokaryk in:

  3. Search for Gregory M. Erickson in:

  4. Search for Lewis C. Calk in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Chin.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/31461

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.