Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

On the binary nature of cosmic γ-ray burst sources

Abstract

The basic nature of cosmic γ-ray burst sources1 has remained a mystery. Schaefer2 and Schaefer et al.3 recently discovered three images on archival photographic plates probably due to optical flashes from the error boxes of three γ-ray burst sources. This discovery opens up the possibility of ground-based optical studies of these objects (see, for example, ref. 4) and provides an important new set of data that can constrain models significantly (see, for example, ref. 5 and references therein) for these intriguing sources. London and Cominsky6 have considered a model for the optical flashes, wherein γ-ray bursts are emitted by a collapsed object in a close-binary stellar system and a small fraction of the γ radiation is reprocessed into optical radiation in the surface layers of the companion star (see refs 7 and 8 for possible alternative explanations). Based on their own estimates of the time, τ, required to reprocess the γ radiation into optical light, London and Cominsky concluded that a binary model would not account for the observed optical flashes. They considered, however, only main-sequence stars and hydrogen-depleted degenerate dwarfs as possible companion stars. We reconsider here the binary model and conclude that it is viable. In particular, under the assumption that the optical flashes were produced by γ-ray bursts of about the same intensity as those observed, we find that nearby (100 pc) binary systems with secondaries whose masses are less than 0.06 M can fit all the observational constraints for the three optical/γ-ray pair events (hereafter 1928/1978, 1944/1979 and 1901/1979; see Table 1).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klebesadel, R. W., Strong, I. B. & Olson, R. A. Astrophys. J. Lett. 182, L85–L88 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schaefer, B. E. Nature 294, 722–724 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schaefer, B. E. et al. Astrophys. J. Lett. 286, L1–L4 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ricker, G. R., Doty, J. P., Vallerga, J. V. & Vanderspek, R. K. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum. Engr. 445, 370 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  5. High-Energy Transients in Astrophysics (ed. Woosley, S. E.) (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1984).

  6. London, R. A. & Cominsky, L. R. Astrophys. J. Lett. 275, L59–L63 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Woosley, S. E. in High-Energy Transients in Astrophysics (ed. Woosley, S. E.) 485 (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Katz, J. Astrophys. Lett. (in the press).

  9. Rappaport, S., Verbunt, F. & Joss, P. C. Astrophys. J. 275, 713–731 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mazets, E. P. et al. Astrophys. Space Sci. 80, 3–83 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mazets, E. P. et al. Astrophys. Space Sci. 80, 119–143 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schaefer, B. E. & Ricker, G. R. Nature 302, 43–45 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schaefer, B. E., Seitzer, P. & Bradt, H. V. D. Astrophys. J. Lett. 270, L49–L52 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pedersen, H. et al. Astrophys. J. Lett. 270, L43–L47 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Barat, C. et al. Astrophys. J. Lett. 286, L5–L9 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schaefer, B. E. thesis, Massachusetts Inst. Technology (1983).

  17. Oort, J. H. Bull. Astr. Inst. Neth. 15, 45 (1960).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bahcall, J., Hut, P. & Tremaine, S. Astrophys. J. (in the press).

  19. Ventura, J., Bonazzola, S., Hameury, J. M. & Heyvaerts, J. Nature, 301, 491–493 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Elvis, M., Soltan, A. & Keel, W. C. Astrophys. J. 283, 479–485 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Grindlay, J. E. et al. Nature 300, 730–731 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Joss, P. C. & Rappaport, S. in High-Energy Transients in Astrophysics (ed. Woosley, S. E.) 555 (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rappaport, S., Joss, P. On the binary nature of cosmic γ-ray burst sources. Nature 314, 242–245 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1038/314242a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/314242a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing