Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Reduction of oak fecundity by low-density herbivore populations

Abstract

Explanations for the low levels of defoliation in natural woodlands1–6 have assumed that Insect herbivores have a negligible effect on plant fitness and demography7,8, perhaps because of plant compensation9–11. Levels of defoliation between 5 and 15% are typical, and are attributed variously to the impact of natural enemies, inclement weather and low food quality in keeping herbivore populations at low densities12,13 (but see refs 14, 15). Here I report the results of a 4-yr study in which matched pairs of oak trees, Quercus robur, were sprayed regularly to exclude all herbivorous insects; despite the fact that the unsprayed trees lost only 8–12% of their leaf area, the sprayed trees consistently produced more seeds (from 4.5 to 2.5 times the numbers on unsprayed plants). It is not known whether this substantial reduction in seed production actually leads to a reduction in plant recruitment. It does seem, however, that plant compensation is not fully effective against low-density herbivore populations and, therefore, that slight differences in the level of defoliation between plants may cause important differences in plant fitness.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bray, J. R. Ecology 45, 165–167 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Golley, F., Odum, H. T. & Wilson, R. F. Ecology 43, 9–19 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Haukioja, E. Tundra Ecosystems: A Comparative Analysis (eds Bliss, L. C., Heal, O. W. & Moore, J. J.) 547–555 (Cambridge University Press, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kaczmarek, W. Secondary Productivity of Terrestrial Ecosystems (ed. Petrusewicz, K.) 663–678 (IBP, Warsaw, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Reichle, D. E., Goldstein, R. A., Van Hook, R. I. & Dodson, G. J. Ecology 54, 1076–1084 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rothacher, J. S., Blow, F. E. & Potts, S. M. J. For. 52, 169–173 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gradwell, G. The British Oak (eds Morris, M. G. & Perring, F. H.) 182–193 (Classey, Farringdon, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jameson, D. A. Bot. Rev. 29, 532–594 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Crawley, M. J. Herbivory (Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heichel, G. H. & Turner, N. C. Oecologia (Berlin) 57, 14–19 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Varley, G. C. & Gradwell, G. R. Proc. 11th int. Congr. Ent. 2, 211–214 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  12. May, R. M. Theoretical Ecology 2nd edn (Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Price, P. W. et al. A. Rev. ecol. Syst. 11, 41–65 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Morrow, P. A. & LaMarche, V. C. Science 210, 1224–1226 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stevens, G. R. Conn. agric. exp. Stn Bull. 796, 1–13 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Worthing, C. R. The Pesticide Manual 7th edn (British Crop Protection Council, London, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Southwood, T. R. E. Ecological Methods 2nd edn (Chapman & Hall, London, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Collins, M., Crawley, M. J. & McGavin, G. C. Ecol. Ent. 8, 133–138 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Caswell, H. Ecology 63, 1218–1222 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stearns, S. C. Oikos 35, 266–281 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Torrent, J. A. FAO Pl. Prot. Bull. 3, 117–121 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kulman, H. M. A. Rev. Ent. 16, 289–324 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rockwood, L. L. Ecology 54, 1363–1369 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Heichel, G. H. & Turner, N. C. Oecologia (Berlin) 62, 1–6 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crawley, M. Reduction of oak fecundity by low-density herbivore populations. Nature 314, 163–164 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1038/314163a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/314163a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing