Abstract
Lyttleton hypothesized long ago that Triton and Pluto originated as adjacent prograde satellites of Neptune1. With the presently accepted masses of Triton and Pluto–Charon2,3, however, the momentum and energy exchange that would be required to set Triton on a retrograde trajectory is impossible. The mass of Triton has probably been seriously overestimated4,5, but not by enough to relax this restriction. It is implausible that the present angular momentum state of Pluto–Charon has been significantly influenced by Neptune6. It could not acquire such angular momentum during an ejection event unless a physical collision was involved, which is quite unlikely. The simplest hypothesis is that Triton and Pluto are independent representatives of large outer Solar System planetesimals. Triton is simply captured, with potentially spectacular consequences that include runaway melting of interior ices and release to the surface of clathrated CH4, CO and N2 (ref. 7). Condensed remnants of this proto-atmosphere could account for features in Triton's unique spectrum8–11.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Lyttleton, R. A. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 97, 108–115 (1936).
Alden, H. L. Astr. J. 50, 110–111 (1943).
Harrington, R. S. & Christy, J. W. Astr. J. 86, 442–443 (1981).
Cruikshank, D. P., Stockton, A., Dyck, H. M., Becklin, E. E. & Macy, W. Jr Icarus 40, 104–114 (1979).
McKinnon, W. B. Bull. Am. astr. Soc. 14, 765 (1982).
Lin, D. N. C. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 197, 1081–1085 (1981).
McKinnon, W. B. Bull. Am. astr. Soc. 15, 857 (1983).
Cruikshank, D. P. & Silvaggio, P. M. Astrophys. J. 223, 1016–1020 (1979).
Rieke, G. H., Lebofsky, L. A., Lebofsky, M. J. & Montgomery, E. F. Nature 294, 59–60 (1981).
Apt, J., Carleton, N. P. & Mackay, C. D. Astrophys. J. 270, 342–350 (1983).
Cruikshank, D. P., Brown, R. H. & Clark, R. N. Abstr. Natural Satellites, IAU Colloq. No. 77, 40 (1983).
Goldreich, P. & Soter, S. Icarus 5, 375–389 (1966).
Munk, W. H. & MacDonald, G. J. F. The Rotation of the Earth Ch. 5 (Cambridge University Press, 1975).
Reitsma, H. J., Hubbard, W. B., Lebofsky, L. A. & Tholen, D. J. Science 215, 289–291 (1982).
Veillet, Ch., thesis, Univ. Paris (1983).
Tisserand, F. Traité de Mécanique Céleste Vol. 4, Ch. 12 (Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1896).
Harris, A. W. Abstr. Natural Satellites, IAU Colloq. 77, 41 (1983).
Morrison, D., Cruikshank, D. P. & Brown, R. H. Nature 300, 425–427 (1982).
Lebofsky, L. A., Rieke, G. H. & Lebofsky, M. J. Bull. Am. astr. Soc. 14, 766 (1982).
Lupo, M. J. & Lewis, J. S. Icarus 40, 157–170 (1979).
Weidenschilling, S. J. Icarus 64, 124–126 (1981).
Chandrasekhar, S. Ellipsoidal Figures of Equilibrium Chs 5, 6 (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1969).
Aggarwal, H. R. & Oberbeck, V. R. Astrophys. J. 191, 577–588 (1974).
Harrington, R. S. & Van Flandern, T. C. Icarus 39, 131–136 (1979).
Farinella, P., Milani, A., Nobili, A. M. & Valsecchi, G. B. Moon Planets 20, 415–421 (1979); Icarus 44, 810–812 (1980).
Nacozy, P. E. & Diehl, R. E. Astr. J. 83, 522–530 (1978).
Harris, A. W. & Ward, W. R. A. Rev. Earth planet. Sci. 10, 61–108 (1982).
Weidenschilling, S. J. Icarus 44, 807–809 (1980).
Farinella, P., Paolicchi, P. & Zappala, V. Astr. Astrophys. 104, 159–165 (1981).
Harris, A. W. Bull. Am. astr. Soc. 15, 828 (1983).
Huang, T.-Y. & Innanen, K. A. Astr. J. 88, 1537–1547 (1983).
Pollack, J. B., Burns, J. A. & Tauber, M. E. Icarus 37, 587–611 (1979).
Nakazawa, K., Komuro, T. & Hayashi, C. Moon Planets 28, 311–327 (1983).
Lewis, J. S. & Prinn, R. G. Astrophys. J. 238, 357–364 (1980).
Prinn, R. G. & Fegley, B. Astrophys. J. 249, 308–317 (1981).
Abstr. Natural Satellites, IAU Colloq. 77, 43 (1983).
Freeman, K. C. & Lyngå, G. Astrophys. J. 160, 767–780 (1970).
Hubbard, W. B. et al. Astr. J. (submitted).
Elliot, J. L., Dunham, E., Mink, D. J. & Churms, J. Astrophys. J. 236, 1026–1030 (1980).
Elliot, J. L. et al. Astr. J. 86, 444–455 (1981).
Hege, E. K. et al. Icarus 50, 72–81 (1982).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McKinnon, W. On the origin of Triton and Pluto. Nature 311, 355–358 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1038/311355a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/311355a0
This article is cited by
-
Evolution of Icy Satellites
Space Science Reviews (2010)
-
A giant impact origin for Pluto's small moons and satellite multiplicity in the Kuiper belt
Nature (2006)
-
Neptune's capture of its moon Triton in a binary–planet gravitational encounter
Nature (2006)
-
A smashing pair
Nature (2005)
-
Discovery of five irregular moons of Neptune
Nature (2004)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.