Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Age difference between polar ice and the air trapped in its bubbles


Air entrapped in bubbles formed in cold ice has essentially the same composition as that of the atmosphere at the time of bubble formation. The analysis of dated ice samples therefore enables the history of atmospheric composition to be investigated.1–3 The age of the entrapped air is, however, not the same as that of the surrounding ice because air bubbles only become isolated from the atmosphere during the transition from firn to ice. Typically the age of the ice at this transition is between 100 and 3,000 yr, depending mainly on firn temperature and snow accumulation rate. The mean age difference between ice and enclosed air, as well as the age distribution width for a given sample, are especially important for the investigation of the anthropogenic increase of CO2 and trace gases in the atmosphere over the last centuries, and for the comparison of climatic parameters recorded in the ice with parameters recorded in the bubbles. For Siple Station (Antarctica), this age difference and age distribution width were deduced from the bubble volume measured as a function of depth. The values are 95 yr and 22 yr respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. Delmas, R. J., Ascencio, J.-M. & Legrand, M. Nature 284, 155–157 (1980).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Neftel, A., Oeschger, H., Schwander, J., Stauffer, B. & Zumbrunn, R. Nature 295, 220–223 (1982).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stauffer, B., Hofer, H., Oeschger, H., Schwander, J. & Siegenthaler, U. Ann. Glaciol. (in the press).

  4. Langway, C. C. Jr Physics of the Movement of the Ice, Chamonix (IUGG Meet., IAHS Publ. No. 47, 336–349, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Raynaud, D. & Lebel, B. Nature 281, 289–291 (1979).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Neftel, A., Oeschger, H., Schwander, J. & Stauffer, B. J. phys. Chem. 87, 4116–4120 (1983).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hammer, C. U. J. Glaciol. 25, 359–372 (1980).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stauffer, B. & Schwander, J. Antarct. J. 18, No. 5 (1983).

  9. Loosli, H. H. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 63, 51–62 (1983).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stauffer, B. Z. Gletscherk. Glazialgeol. 17, 17–56 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Herron, M. M. & Langway, C. C. J. Glaciol. 25, 373–385 (1980).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwander, J., Stauffer, B. Age difference between polar ice and the air trapped in its bubbles. Nature 311, 45–47 (1984).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing