Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Spinal Cord
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. spinal cord
  3. scientific review
  4. article
Functional electrical stimulation for grasping and walking: indications and limitations
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Published: 20 August 2001

Functional electrical stimulation for grasping and walking: indications and limitations

  • M R Popovic1,
  • A Curt2,
  • T Keller1,2 &
  • …
  • V Dietz2 

Spinal Cord volume 39, pages 403–412 (2001)Cite this article

  • 4470 Accesses

  • 94 Citations

  • 3 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

Abstract

This review describes the state of art in the field of Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) and its impact on improving grasping and walking functions in acute and chronic Spinal Cord Injured (SCI) patients. It is argued that during the early rehabilitation period the FES systems with surface stimulation electrodes should be used to assist training of hand and leg movements in SCI patients. Our clinical trials have shown that a number of acute SCI patients with impaired walking and grasping functions could improve these functions due to training with an adjustable FES system to the point that they finally did not need the FES system to carry out these tasks. Other acute SCI patients, who did not recover the desired function, were enabled to perform either walking or grasping with the FES assistance. We believe that the subjects who can perform grasping or walking with the help of FES, and still use the neuroprosthesis 6 months after being subjected to the FES training, should consider the FES system as a prosthetic device in Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Despite the significant technical progress achieved in the last 10 to 15 years in the FES field, there is a general consensus that these systems are not sufficiently advanced and that they need further development. The limited acceptance of the FES technology can be in part explained by the fact that it is not completely mature and that the patients still require daily assistance to use the FES systems. Nevertheless the present FES treatments combined with conventional occupational and physical therapy still remain the most promising approach in rehabilitating SCI patients. In this review, advantages and limitations of different FES systems that are used to restore grasping and walking functions are discussed.

Spinal Cord (2001) 39, 403–412.

References

  1. Kantrowitz A . Electronic Physiological Aids Report on the Maimonides Hospital Brooklyn 1960 4–5

  2. Baker L et al. Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation – A Practical Guide 3rd edn USA: Rehabilitation Engineering Program, Los Amigos Research and Education Institute, Rancho Los Amigos Medical Center 1993

  3. Guyton A, Hall J Textbook of Medical Physiology 9th edn W.B. Saunders Company 1996

    Google Scholar 

  4. Quintern J . Application of functional electrical stimulation in paraplegic patients NeuroRehabilitation 1998 10: 205–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cameron T et al. Micromodular implants to provide electrical stimulation of paralyzed muscles and limbs IEEE Tr Biomed Eng 1997 44: 781–790

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoshiyama N, Handa Y . A master-slave type multichannel functional electrical stimulation (FES) system for the control of the paralyzed upper extremities Automedica 1989 11: 209–220

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smith B, Peckham P, Keith M, Roscoe D . An externally powered, multichannel, implantable stimulator for versatile control of paralyzed muscle IEEE Tr Biomech Eng 1987 34: 499–508

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tyler D, Durand A . A slowly penetrating interfascicular nerve electrodes for selective activation of peripheral nerves IEEE Tr Rehab Eng 1997 5: 51–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kobetic R, Morsolais E . Synthesis of paraplegic gait with multichannel functional neuromuscular stimulation IEEE Tr Rehab Eng 1994 2: 66–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mortimer J . Motor prostheses Handbook of Physiology – The Nervous System II American Physiological Society 1981 pp 155–187

  11. Ditunno JF, Young W, Donovan WH, Creasy G . The International Standards Booklet for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury Paraplegia 1994 32: 70–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sollerman C, Ejeskar A . Sollerman hand function test: A standardized method and its use in tetraplegic patients Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1995 29: 167–176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ditunno JF et al. Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI): An international multicenter validity and reliability study Spinal Cord 2000 38: 234–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rutz S, Dietz V, Curt A . Diagnostic and prognostic value of compound motor action potential of lower limbs in acute paraplegic patients Spinal Cord 2000 38: 203–210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Curt A, Dietz V . Traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: relation between somatosensory-evoked potentials, neurological deficits, and hand function Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996 77: 48–53

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Curt A, Dietz V . Neurographic assessment of intramedullar motoneurone lesions in cervical spinal cord injury: consequences for hand function Spinal Cord 1996 34: 326–332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Curt A, Dietz V . Nerve conduction in cervical spinal cord injury: significance for hand function NeuroRehabilitation 1996 7: 165–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Curt A, Dietz V . Ambulatory capacity in spinal cord injury: significance of somatosensory evoked potentials and ASIA protocols in predicting outcome Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997 78: 39–43

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Curt A, Keck M, Dietz V . Clinical value of F-wave recordings in traumatic cervical spinal cord injury Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1997 105: 189–193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Curt A, Dietz V . Electrophysiological recordings in patients with spinal cord injury: significance for predicting outcome Spinal Cord 1999 37: 157–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dietz V . Neurophysiology of gait disorders: present and future applications Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1997 103: 333–335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Popovic MR et al. Surface-stimulation technology for grasping and walking neuroprostheses IEEE Eng Med Biol Magazine 2001 20: 82–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bajd T et al. Use of functional electrical stimulation in the rehabilitation of patients with incomplete spinal cord injuries J Biomed Eng 1989 11: 96–102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Popovic D et al. Clinical evaluation of the Bionic Glove Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999 80: 299–304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ijzerman M et al. The NESS Handmaster orthosis: restoration of hand function in C5 and stroke patients by means of electrical stimulation J Rehabil Sci 1996 9: 86–89

    Google Scholar 

  26. Prochazka A, Gauthier M, Wieler M, Kanwell Z . The Bionic Glove: An electrical stimulator garment that provides controlled grasp and hand opening in quadriplegia Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997 78: 1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Graupe D, Davis R, Kordylewski H, Kohn KH . Ambulation by traumatic T4-12 paraplegics using functional neuromuscular stimulation Crit Rev Neurosurg 1998 8: 221–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Graupe D, Kohn KH . Functional neuromuscular stimulator for short-distance ambulation by certain thoracic-level spinal-cord-injured paraplegics Surg Neurol 1998 50: 202–207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wieler M, Naaman S, Stein RB . WalkAid: An improved functional electrical stimulator for correcting foot-drop Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference of the International FES Society 1996 pp 101–104

  30. Taylor PN et al. Correction of bilateral dropped foot using the Odstock 2 channel stimulator (O2CHS) Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference of the International FES Society 1999 pp 257–260

  31. Davis R, Houdayer T, Andrews B, Barriskill A Paraplegia: implanted Praxis24–FES system for multi-functional restoration Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference of the International FES Society 1999 pp 155–158

  32. Kobetic R, Triolo R, Morsolais E . Muscle selection and walking performance of multichannel FES systems for ambulation in paraplegia IEEE Tr Rehab Eng 1997 5: 23–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Taylor P, Esnouf J, Hobby J . Pattern of use and user satisfaction of neuro control freehand system Spinal Cord 2001 39: 156–160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Haugland M, Lickel A, Haase J, Sinkjaer T . Control of FES thumb force using slip information obtained from the cutaneous electroneurogram in quadriplegic man IEEE Tr Rehab Eng 1999 7: 215–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lickel A . Restoration of lateral hand grasp in a tetraplegic patient applying natural sensory feedback. Center for sensory-motor interaction SMI, Aalborg University, Denmark 1998

  36. Catz A et al. SCIM – Spinal Cord Independence Measure: a new disability scale for patients with spinal cord lesions Spinal Cord 1997 35: 850–856

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rebersk S, Vodovnik L . Proportionally controlled functional electrical stimulation of hand Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1973 54: 168–172

    Google Scholar 

  38. Popovic D et al.. Clinical evaluation of the Belgrade Grasping System. Proceedings of the 6th Vienna International Workshop on FES1998 pp 247–250

  39. Hart RL, Kilgore KL, Peckham PH . A comparison between control methods for implanted FES hand-grasp systems IEEE Tr Rehab Eng 1998 6: 208–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Grill JH, Peckham PH . Functional neuromuscular stimulation for combined control of elbow extension and hand grasp in C5 and C6 quadriplegics IEEE Tr Rehab Eng 1998 6: 190–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Liberson WT, Holmquest HJ, Scot D, Dow M . Functional electrotherapy: Stimulation of the peroneal nerve synchronized with the swing phase of the gait of hemiplegic patients Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1961 42: 101–105

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Vodovnik L et al. Recent applications of functional electrical stimulation to stroke patients in Ljubljana Clin Orthopaed Related Res 1978 131: 64–70

    Google Scholar 

  43. MicroFES – Manual. Institut ‘Jozef Stefan’ Ljubljana, Slovenia 1991

  44. Solomonow M et al. Reciprocating gait orthosis powered with electrical muscle stimulation (RGO II) Part I: Performance evaluation of 70 paraplegic patients Orthopaedics 1997 20: 315–324

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Solomonow M et al. Reciprocating gait orthosis powered with electrical muscle stimulation (RGO II) Part II: Medical evaluation of 70 paraplegic patients Orthopedics 1997 20: 411–418

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Popovic D, Tomovic R, Schwirtlich L . Hybrid assistive system – the motor neuroprosthesis IEEE Tr Biomed Eng 1989 36: 729–737

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Kralj A, Bajd T, Turk R . Enhancement of gait restoration in spinal injured patients by functional electrical stimulation Clin Orthopaed Related Res 1988 223: 34–43

    Google Scholar 

  48. Bajd T, Kralj A, Stefancic M, Lavrac N . Use of functional electrical stimulation in the lower extremities of incomplete spinal cord injured patients Artificial Organs 1999 23: 403–409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Phillips CA . An interactive system of electrical stimulators and gait orthosis for walking in the spinal cord injured Automedica 1989 11: 247–261

    Google Scholar 

  50. Pappas IPI et al. Reliable gait phase detection system IEEE Tr Neural Syst Rehab Eng 2001 9: 113–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The project presented in this review is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (project No. 5002-057811.1), the Committee for Technology and Innovation (project No. 4891.1) and company Compex SA, all located in Switzerland. Additional information regarding this and other projects of our group can be found at http://www.aut.ee.ethz.ch/∼fes/.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Automatic Control Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, ETH Zürich, Switzerland

    M R Popovic & T Keller

  2. ParaCare, Institute for Rehabilitation and Research, University Hospital Balgrist, Zürich, Switzerland

    A Curt, T Keller & V Dietz

Authors
  1. M R Popovic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A Curt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T Keller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. V Dietz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Canada

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Popovic, M., Curt, A., Keller, T. et al. Functional electrical stimulation for grasping and walking: indications and limitations. Spinal Cord 39, 403–412 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101191

Download citation

  • Published: 20 August 2001

  • Issue Date: 01 August 2001

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101191

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • functional electrical stimulation
  • neuroprostheses
  • grasping function
  • walking function

This article is cited by

  • Feasibility of home hand rehabilitation using musicglove after chronic spinal cord injury

    • Quentin Sanders
    • Vicky Chan
    • Kelli Sharp

    Spinal Cord Series and Cases (2022)

  • Short-term facilitation effects elicited by cortical priming through theta burst stimulation and functional electrical stimulation of upper-limb muscles

    • Na Cao
    • Atsushi Sasaki
    • Kimitaka Nakazawa

    Experimental Brain Research (2022)

  • Neuromuscular fatigue detection by mechanomyography in people with complete spinal cord injury

    • Eddy Krueger
    • Lana Popović-Maneski
    • Percy Nohama

    Research on Biomedical Engineering (2020)

  • Short-term inhibition of spinal reflexes in multiple lower limb muscles after neuromuscular electrical stimulation of ankle plantar flexors

    • Matija Milosevic
    • Yohei Masugi
    • Kimitaka Nakazawa

    Experimental Brain Research (2019)

  • Effects of orthotic therapeutic electrical stimulation in the treatment of patients with paresis associated with acute cervical spinal cord injury: a randomized control trial

    • K Iwahashi
    • T Hayashi
    • K Shiba

    Spinal Cord (2017)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Calendar of Events
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Publishing
  • About the Editors
  • About the Partner
  • Contact
  • For Advertisers

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Spinal Cord (Spinal Cord) ISSN 1476-5624 (online) ISSN 1362-4393 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • Nano
  • Protocol Exchange
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Live Expert Trainer-led workshops
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Career development

  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences
  • Nature events

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Italy
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Korea
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Limited