Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Effects of acidification and complexation from radiolytic reactions on leach rates of SYNROC C and nuclear waste glass

Abstract

Previous work1 has shown that γ-radiation induced enhancement of leach rates from high-level radioactive waste (HLW) solids can be attributed to radiolytic acidification of the aqueous solution and to radiolytic formation of organic complexing species, for example, (COOH)2, HCOOH. Barkatt et al.1 compared the leach resistance of three HLW glasses and SYNROC D (specifically designed for incorporation of US defence wastes2) and found that, at low pH and with complexing agents, higher alumina contents in the waste form gave large enhancement of leach rates. Specifically, in acid solution, the elemental leach rates for SYNROC D were increased relative to the glasses by factors between 20 and 1,200. The formulation of SYNROC C, designed by Ringwood2 for incorporation of reprocessed waste from commercial power reactors, was not tested in these conditions. We report here that SYNROC C is considerably more resistant than the standard HLW glass PNL 76–68 to acid attack and to possible complexation reactions between 90 and 150 °C, despite an alumina content in the formulation that is much higher than that for PNL 76–68. The Al content of SYNROC C is much lower than that of SYNROC D (Table 1) and it is largely present in the hollandite phase after hot pressing. No aluminosilicate phases are formed in SYNROC C and, for this reason, the pH dependence is much less marked. These results are significant in assessing the effects of changes induced by the ionizing radiation to which the HLW solid and solution will be exposed during geological isolation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barkatt, A., Barkatt, A. & Sousanpour, W. Nature 300, 339–341 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ringwood, A. E. et al. Nucl. chem. Waste Manag. 2, 287–305 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cousens, D. R. et al. Scientific Basis for Radioactive Waste Mangement Vol. 5 (ed. Lutze, W.) 310–317 (Elsevier, New York, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Campbell, J. et al. High Level Waste Technical Review, Atlanta (UCRL-85913, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nuclear Waste Materials Handbook—Test Methods (DOE/ TIC-11400, Rev 1 Materials Characterization Center, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, 1983).

  6. Reeve, K. D., Levins, D. M., Ramm, E. J. & Woolfrey, J. L. Proc. int. Symp. on Conditioning of Radioactive Wastes for Storage and Disposal, 375–390 (IAEA, Vienna, 1983).

  7. Campbell, J. et al. Properties of SYNROC D Nuclear Waste Form: A State-of-the-Art Review (UCRL-53240, 1982).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Cooper, J. et al. The Incorporation and Retention of Caesium in SYNROC C (Griffith University).

  9. Solomah, A. G. & Zumwalt, L. R. Nucl. chem. Waste Manag. 3, 111–115 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dosch, R. G. & Lynch, A. E. Solution Chemistry in SYNROC Preparation (SAND 80-2375, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Strachan, D. M. Results from Long-term Use of the Static Leach Test Method (MCC-1) (PNL-SA-10762, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levins, D., Smart, R. Effects of acidification and complexation from radiolytic reactions on leach rates of SYNROC C and nuclear waste glass. Nature 309, 776–778 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1038/309776a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/309776a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing