Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The relationship between density and mean frond weight in monospecific seaweed stands

Abstract

The equation w = Kd−3/2 (log10 w = log10 K − 1.5 log10 d) (1) defines a boundary condition known as the −3/2 power law1, above which combinations of mean plant weight and density may not occur. In this equation w is mean above-ground plant dry weight, d is plant density and K is a constant. For developing cohorts of plants combinations of mean weight and density approach and then move parallel to this boundary along lines for which log10 K is typically between 3.5 and 4.32. Annual shoot populations produced by clonal perennial herbs approach, but do not cross the line where log10 K = 4.3 (refs 3, 4). Dense, natural stands of many species with a wide range of growth forms and age distributions lie close to, but below the same line2,5. Virtually all plant populations for which data are available, therefore, fall below the line given by log10 w = 4.3 − 1.5 log10 d (2) We present here evidence suggesting that this line also defines a boundary condition for mean weight and density combinations in monospecific seaweed stands.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yoda, K., Kira, T., Ogawa, H. & Hozumi, K. J. Biol., Osaka City Univ. 14, 107–129 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  2. White, J. in Demography and Evolution in Plant Populations (ed. Solbrig, O. T.) 21–48 (Blackwell, Oxford, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mulchings, M. J. J. Ecol. 67, 21–33 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mook, J. H. & Toorn, J. van der. J. appl. Ecol. 19, 501–517 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gorham, E. Nature 279, 148–150 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kays, S. & Harper, J. L. J. Ecol. 62, 97–105 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fernandez, C. & Niell, F. X. Oecol. aquatica 5, 43–52 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rice, E. L. & Chapman, A. R. O. Mar. Biol. (in the press).

  9. Schiel, D. R. & Choat, J. H. Nature 285, 324–326 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cousens, R. thesis, Dalhousie Univ. (1981).

  11. Hutchings, M. J. & Budd, C. S. J. BioScience 31, 640–645 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hutchings, M. J. & Budd, C. S. J. Oikos 36, 319–325 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Westoby, M. & Howell, J. J. Ecol. 69, 359–365 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lonsdale, W. M. & Watkinson, A. R. New Phytol. 90, 431–445 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. White, J. J. theor. Biol., 89, 475–500 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Westoby, M. Am. Nat. 118, 581–587 (1981).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Cousens, R. Botanica mar. 25, 191–195 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. White, J. & Harper, J. L. J. Ecol. 58, 467–486 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cousens, R., Hutchings, M. The relationship between density and mean frond weight in monospecific seaweed stands. Nature 301, 240–241 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1038/301240a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/301240a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing