Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

X rays may be twice as potent as γ rays for malignant transformation at low doses

Abstract

The introduction in the 1950s of 60Co teletherapy units and megavoltage X-ray accelerators for radiotherapy prompted several studies which showed that the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of orthovoltage X rays, compared with 60Co γ rays, was 1.1–1.2 (refs 1, 2). Subsequently, radiation therapists confirmed that the effect of established treatment protocols using orthovoltage X rays could be duplicated with the higher energy radiation by increasing the dose by 10%, when radiation doses are of the order of tens of grays (or thousands of rads). The dependence of biological effectiveness on photon energy led to recommendations in which the quality factor, Q, which is an RBE for radiation protection purposes, was set at unity for X and γ rays as well as for electrons or other directly ionizing particles having a linear energy transfer (LET) of <3.5 keV µm−1. Over the past decade, however, several studies have shown differences in RBE between various low-LET radiations having LET values within the range designated for standard radiation3–6. Underbrink et al.7 found an RBE for orthovoltage X rays relative to 60Co γ rays of 2 at 0.04 Gy, for induction of pink mutations in the stamen hairs of Tradescantia. Schmidt et al.8 scored chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes, and at 0.25 Gy found the RBE of 200-kVp X rays relative to 3-MeV electrons to be also 2. Here we have compared 60Co γ rays and orthovoltage X rays over the dose range 0.03–1.5 Gy using malignant transformation in mammalian cells in vitro9–13 as an end point. Our findings indicate that whereas the transformation incidence seems similar for X and γ rays at high doses, the malignant potential of X rays is about twice that of γ rays at 0.03 Gy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hall, E. J. Br. J. Radiol. 34, 313 (1961).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sinclair, W. Radiat. Res. 16, 394 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lloyd, D. C. et al. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 28, 75–90 (1975).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Virsik, R. P. & Harder, D. Radiat. envir. Biophys 14, 109–121 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zeitz, L., Kim, S. H., Kim, J. H. & Detko, J. F. Radiat. Res. 70, 552–563 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Berry, R. J., Cavanagh, J., Oliver, R. & Winston, B. M. Hlth Phys. 24, 369–374 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Underbrink, A., Kellerer, A., Mills, R. & Sparrow, A. Radiat. envir. Biophys. 13, 295 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schmidt, E., Rimpl, G. & Bauchinger, M., Radiat. Res. 57, 228 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Borek, C. & Sachs, L. Nature 210, 276–278 (1966).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Borek, C. & Hall, E. J. Nature 243, 450–453 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Borek, C. & Hall, E. J. Nature 252, 499–501 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Borek, C., Hall, E. J. & Rossi, H. H. Cancer Res. 38, 2997–3005 (1978).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Han, A. & Elkind, M. J. Cancer Res. 39, 123–130 (1979).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bond, V. P., Meinhold, C. B. & Rossi, H. H. Hlth Phys. 34, 433–438 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Arnett, L. M. Rep. DP-1416, Savannah River Laboratory, DuPont, Aiken, South Carolina, 1–19 (1976).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Borek, C., Hall, E. & Zaider, M. X rays may be twice as potent as γ rays for malignant transformation at low doses. Nature 301, 156–158 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1038/301156a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/301156a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing