Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Facular influences on the apparent solar shape

Abstract

The apparent shape of the Sun is controversial1: Dicke and Goldenberg2 measured a Sun with an oblateness (equatorial minus polar radius divided by polar radius) of 5 × 10−5, whereas Hill and Stebbins measured a value of 0.9 × 10−5, consistent with a slowly rotating core. More recently, Claverie et al.3 have found the Sun's interior may be rotating faster than the surface after all. Dicke and Goldenberg's observations were questioned by Chapman and Ingersoll4 on the basis that facular influences could introduce a signal which appeared similar to the solar oblateness signal both in shape and magnitude. Dicke5 analysed the data in many different ways (such as dividing the data on the basis of facular brightness, and different window size) and concluded that the faculae did not contribute significantly. We reexamine this question by means of more general facular contrast models. We find that the faculae can contribute a signal which has a time dependence similar to the Dicke and Goldenberg oblateness signal, and which for a facular contrast within the range of acceptable values allows an acceptable fit to the oblateness measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hill, H. A. & Stebbins, R. T. Astrophys. J. 200, 471 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dicke, R. H. & Goldenberg, H. M., Rev. Lett. 18, 313–316 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Claverie, A., Isaak, G. R., McLead, C. P., van der Raay, H. B. & Roca Cortes, T. Nature 293, 443–445 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chapman, G. A. & Ingersoll, A. P. Astrophys. J. 175, 819–829 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dicke, R. H. Astrophys. J. 175, 831–835 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sofia, S., Oster, L. & Schatten, K. Solar Phys. 80, 87 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chapman, G. A. Astrophys. J. Lett. 242, L45–47 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Frazier, E. N. Solar Phys. 21, 42 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chapman, G. A. Solar Phys. 14, 315 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Spruit, H. C. Solar Phys. 50, 269–275 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schatten, K., Sofia, S. Facular influences on the apparent solar shape. Nature 301, 133–134 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1038/301133a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/301133a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing