Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Origin of desert loess from some experimental observations

Abstract

A longstanding problem of Quaternary geology has been the origin of the silty deposit known as loess. Of the many explanations for its formation and distribution1,2, the most commonly accepted is that the silt is produced by subglacial grinding processes1,3,4, followed by redistribution and deposition by the wind. The large expanses of loess in central Europe are therefore considered to be the consequence of Quaternary glaciation5. There is, however, a view6,7 that loessic silt may also originate as the product of processes in hot deserts. Some proponents of the desert loess hypothesis consider that silt-size material is the product of weathering processes7 which may include salt weathering8 or weathering down incipient cracks9. An alternative mechanism is aeolian attrition of sand grains, although, probably as a result of the experimental work of Kuenen10, Smalley and Krinsley11 consider that only fine silt (2–6 µm) is produced in large quantities by the abrasion of quartz grains. We have simulated aeolian attrition of angular quartz grains previously produced by weathering in deserts. The products of abrasion show that both coarse and fine silt sizes are produced. These findings suggest that desert aeolian processes can produce loess. We also suggest that much of this material from many deserts has been deposited in the sea but that the Chinese loess could have been produced in the Gobi desert. The finest particles produced by such attrition may be a source of silica for silcrete formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smalley, I. J. Loess: Lithology and Genesis (Dowden Hutchinson and Ross, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lill, G. O. & Smalley, I. J. Proc. geol. Ass. 89, 57–65 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Smalley, I. J. J. sedim. Petrol. 36, 669–676 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Smalley, I. J. & Vita-Finzi, C. J. sedim. Petrol. 38, 766–774 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Smalley, I. J. & Leach, J. A. Sedim. Geol. 21, 1–26 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yaalon, D. H. & Ganor, E. in SCOPE Rep. 14 (ed. Morales, C.) 187–193 (Wiley, New York, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yaalon, D. H. & Dan, J. Z. Geomorph. 20, 91–105 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goudie, A. S., Cooke, R. U. & Doornkamp, J. C. J. Arid Envir. 2, 105–112 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Riezebos, P. A. & Van der Waals, L. Sedim. Geol. 12, 279–285 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuenen, Ph. H. J. Geol. 68, 427–449 (1960).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Smalley, I. J. & Krinsley, D. H. Catena 5, 53–66 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Linde, K. & Mycielska-Dowagiallo, E. Geogr. Annl. 62 A, 171–184 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith, B. J. & Whalley, W. B. Catena 8, 345–367 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Folk, R. L. J. sedim. Petrol. 52, 93–101 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moss, A. J. J. Geol. Soc. Austr. 13, 97–136 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chepil, W. S. Soil Sci. 60, 305–320 (1945).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Smalley, I. J. & Cabrera, J. G. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 81, 1591–1596 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cegla, J., Buckley, T. & Smalley, I. J. Sedimentology 17, 129–134 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Whalley, W. B. Geol. Mag. 111, 84–86 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Marshall, J. R., Whalley, W. B. & Krinsley, D. H. Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. Proc. 1000 (1981).

  21. Whalley, W. B. & Smith, B. J. J. Arid Envir. 4, 21–29 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Geovanoli, R. Naturwissenschaft 69, 237–239 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Glaccum, R. A. & Prospero, J. M. Mar. Geol. 37, 295–321 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sarnthein, M. & Koopman, B. in Sahara and Surrounding Seas (eds Van Zinderen Bakker Sr, E. M. & Coetzee, J. A.) 239–253 (Balkema, Rotterdam, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Prospero, J. M., Glaccum, R. A. & Nees, R. T. Nature 289, 570–572 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whalley, W., Marshall, J. & Smith, B. Origin of desert loess from some experimental observations. Nature 300, 433–435 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1038/300433a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/300433a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing