Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Competition between female relatives in a matrilocal mammal


Evolutionary theory predicts that in sexual organisms the average parents should invest equally in their male and female progeny1 except where related males compete with each other to mate, when selection may favour parents that produce a female-biased sex ratio2–4. It has recently been suggested that in species where daughters adopt home ranges overlapping those of their mothers while sons disperse, competition for resources between female siblings may select for mothers who produce male-biased sex ratios5. We show here that in a mammal living in matrilocal, non-territorial groups—the red deer (Cervus elaphus)—the presence of resident female relatives depresses the reproductive success of adult females, providing a possible explanation of the apparent bias in parental investment towards male offspring in this species6.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Clarendon, Oxford, 1930).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Hamilton, W. D. Science 156, 477–488 (1967).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Charnov, E. L., Hartogh, R. L. L., Jones, W. T. & van den Assem, J. Nature 289, 27–33 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Taylor, P. D. Nature 291, 64–66 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Clark, A. B. Science 201, 163–165 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Clutton-Brock, T. H., Albon, S. D. & Guinness, F. E. Nature 289, 487–489 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Clutton-Brock, T. H., Guinness, F. E. & Albon, S. D. Red Deer: The Behavior and Ecology of Two Sexes (Chicago University Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Glucksman, A. Biol. Rev. 49, 423 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McClure, P. A. Science 211, 1058–1060 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Robinette, W. L., Gashwiler, J. S., Low, J. B. & Jones, D. A. J. Wildl. Mgmt 21, 1–16 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Widdowson, E. M. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 35, 175–176 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ralls, K., Brownell, R. C. & Ballou, J. Rep. int. Whaling Commn 2, 233–243 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grubb, P. in Island Survivors: The Ecology of the Soay Sheep of St Kilda (eds Jewell, P. A., Milner, C. & Boyd, J. M.) 242–272 (Athlone, London, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Trivers, R. L. in Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871–1971 (ed. Campbell, B.) 136–179 (Aldine-Atherton, Chicago, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Guinness, F. E., Hall, M. J. & Cockerill, R. A. Anim. Behav. 27, 536–544 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Greenwood, P. J. Anim. Behav. 28, 1140–1162 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Clutton-Brock, T. H. & Albon, S. D. in Current Problems in Sociobiology (ed. King's College Sociobiology Group) 223–247 (Cambridge University Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pianka, E. R. Evolutionary Ecology (Harper & Row, New York, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mitchell, B., Staines, B. W. & Welch, D. Ecology of Red Deer: A Research Review Relevant to their Management in Scotland (Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Cambridge, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clutton-Brock, T., Albon, S. & Guinness, F. Competition between female relatives in a matrilocal mammal. Nature 300, 178–180 (1982).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing