Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Extreme longevity of lotus seeds from Pulantien

Abstract

In 1923 Ohga1 first brought to general scientific attention the existence of a cache of viable seeds of East Indian lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.), contained within an ancient lakebed deposit at Pulantien in southern Manchuria. From the geological and historical evidence available, Ohga suggested a possible age in excess of 400 years1,2. Libby3 radiocarbon dated some of Ohga's material at 1040±210 years BP. This evidence of great antiquity for viable seeds has been controversial4–6. The main hindrance to the resolution of the problem has been the paucity of available Pulantien seeds following the dissipation of Ohga's original collection7. Recently we have received four Pulantien seeds, three of which were viable, albeit lacking in vigour. The lipids of the unimbibed seeds were examined and found to be still highly polyunsaturated, suggesting that they had undergone little atmospheric autoxidation. Radiocarbon dating of one of the viable seeds suggested a probable age of about 466 years at the time of germination. This is the oldest viable seed for which an age has been directly determined.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ohga, I. Bot. Mag., Tokyo 37, 87–95 (1923).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ohga, I. Bot. Mag., Tokyo 41, 1–6 (1927).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Libby, W. F. Science 114, 291–296 (1951).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Godwin, H. & Willis, E. H. New Phytol. 63, 410–412 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wester, H. V. Hortscience 8, 371–377 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Justice, O. L. & Bass, L. N. Principles and Practices of Seed Storage (USDA Agriculture Handbook No. 506, Washington, D. C., 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chaney, R. W. Gdn. J.N.Y. bot. Gdn 1, 137–139 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Krishtofovich, A. N. Priroda, Mosk. Part 1, 76–78 (1953).

  9. Ohga, I. Jap. J. Bot. 3, 1–20 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ohga, I. Am. J. Bot. 13, 754–759 (1926).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stuiver, M. Radiocarbon 24, 1–26 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Villiers, T. A. in Seed Ecology (ed. Heydecker, W.) 265–288 (Pennsylvania State University, University Park, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Howell, R. W. & Collins, F. I. Agron. J. 49, 593–597 (1957).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Harris, H. C., McWilliam, J. R. & Mason, W. K. Aust. J. agric. Res. 29, 1202–1212 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Anonymous Nature 149, 658 (1942).

  16. Priestley, D. A., Galinat, W. C. & Leopold, A. C. Nature 292, 146–148 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hallam, N. D. & Osborne, D. J. in Eighth International Congress on Electron Microscopy, Canberra, 1974, Vol. 2 (eds Sanders, J. V. & Goodchild, D. J.) 598–599 (Australian Academy of Science, Canberra, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhukova, G. Ya. & Yakovlev, M. S. Bot. Zhur. 61, 869–872 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Priestley, D. A., McBride, M. B., Galinat, W. C. & Leopold, A. C. Pl. Physiol. (Suppl). 67, 115 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Godwin, H. Nature 220, 708–709 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lerman, J. C. & Cigliano, E. M. Nature 232, 568–570 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. MacDougal, D. T. & Smith, G. M. Science 66, 456–457 (1927).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fritts, H. C. Tree Rings and Climate (Academic, London, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Douce, R. & Lance, C. Physiol. Vég. 10, 181–198 (1972).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Priestley, D., Posthumus, M. Extreme longevity of lotus seeds from Pulantien. Nature 299, 148–149 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1038/299148a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/299148a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing