Letter | Published:

Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness

Nature volume 394, pages 884887 (27 August 1998) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

Testosterone-dependent secondary sexual characteristics in males may signal immunological competence1 and are sexually selected for in several species2,3. In humans, oestrogen-dependent characteristics of the female body correlate with health and reproductive fitness and are found attractive4,5,6. Enhancing the sexual dimorphism of human faces should raise attractiveness by enhancing sex-hormone-related cues to youth and fertility in females5,7,8,9,10,11, and to dominance and immunocompetence in males5,12,13. Here we report the results of asking subjects to choose the most attractive faces from continua that enhanced or diminished differences between the average shape of female and male faces. As predicted, subjects preferred feminized to average shapes of a female face. This preference applied across UK and Japanese populations but was stronger for within-population judgements, which indicates that attractiveness cues are learned. Subjects preferred feminized to average or masculinized shapes of a male face. Enhancing masculine facial characteristics increased both perceived dominance and negative attributions (for example, coldness or dishonesty) relevant to relationships and paternal investment. These results indicate a selection pressure that limits sexual dimorphism and encourages neoteny in humans.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350, 33–88 (1991).

  2. 2.

    Female choice for extreme tail length in a widowbird. Nature 299, 818–820 (1992).

  3. 3.

    Female swallow preference for symmetrical male sexual ornaments. Nature 357, 238–240 (1992).

  4. 4.

    Body shape and women's attractiveness—the critical role of waist-to-hip ratio. Hum. Nature 4, 297–3221 (1993).

  5. 5.

    The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: sexual selection and human morphology. Ethol. Sociobiol. 16, 395–424 (1995).

  6. 6.

    , , & Breast asymmetry and phenotypic quality in women. Evol. Hum. Behav. 18, 2223–236 (1997).

  7. 7.

    The Evolution of Human Sexuality (Oxford Univ. Press, (1979)).

  8. 8.

    , Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50, 925–935 (1986).

  9. 9.

    Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behav. Brain Sci. 122, 1–49 (1989).

  10. 10.

    & Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Ethol. Sociobiol. 14, 183–199 (1993).

  11. 11.

    Sexual selection, physical attractiveness, and facial neoteny. Curr. Anthropol. 36, 723–748 (1995).

  12. 12.

    & Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. J. Comp. Psychol. 108, 233–242 (1994).

  13. 13.

    & The evolution of human sexuality. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 98–102 (1996).

  14. 14.

    , & Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness. Nature 368, 239–242 (1994).

  15. 15.

    & Manipulating facial appearance through shape and color. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 15, 70–76 (1995).

  16. 16.

    & Attractive faces are only average. Psychol. Sci. 1, 115–121 (1990).

  17. 17.

    , , & “Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours”: consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female attractiveness. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 68, 261–279 (1995).

  18. 18.

    Physical Appearance and Gender: Sociobiology and Sociocultural Perspectives (State Univ. New York Press, Albany, (1992)).

  19. 19.

    , & Is there a double standard of ageing. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 16, 771–785 (1986).

  20. 20.

    & Accuracy of face perception: a view from ecological psychology. J. Pers. 61, 497–423 (1993).

  21. 21.

    & Testosterone and men's marriages. Social Forces 72, 463–477 (1993).

  22. 22.

    , & What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial attractiveness. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 59, 61–72 (1990).

  23. 23.

    & The evolutionary psychology of extrapair sex: the role of fluctuating symmetry. Ethol. Hum. Behav. 18, 69–88 (1997).

  24. 24.

    & Outward signs of breeding. Nature 293, 7–9 (1990).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Unilever Research and the ESRC. We thank A. Whiten, R. Byrne, R. Barton, J. Lycett, S. Reicher, D. Carey, M. Ridley, J. Graves and D. Symons for comments.

Author information

Author notes

    • K. J. Lee

    Present address: Department of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia 6907, Australia.

Affiliations

  1. *School of Psychology, University of St Andrews, Fife KY16 9JU, UK

    • D. I. Perrett
    • , K. J. Lee
    • , I. Penton-Voak
    • , D. Rowland
    •  & D. M. Burt
  2. ‡Department of Cognitive Psychology in Education, Graduate School of Education, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan

    • S. Yoshikawa
  3. §ATR, Human Information Processing Research Laboratories, 2-2 Hikari-dai, Soraku-gun, Kyoto, 619-02, Japan

    • S. Yoshikawa
    •  & S. Akamatsu
  4. Department of Psychology, University of Natal, King George V Avenue, Durban 4001, South Africa

    • S. P. Henzi
  5. ¶Hasegawa Laboratory, Department of Life Sciences, University of Tokyo, Komaba, Tokyo 153, Japan

    • D. L. Castles

Authors

  1. Search for D. I. Perrett in:

  2. Search for K. J. Lee in:

  3. Search for I. Penton-Voak in:

  4. Search for D. Rowland in:

  5. Search for S. Yoshikawa in:

  6. Search for D. M. Burt in:

  7. Search for S. P. Henzi in:

  8. Search for D. L. Castles in:

  9. Search for S. Akamatsu in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. I. Perrett.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/29772

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.