Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Epidemic models used to explain biogeographical distribution limits

Abstract

It is an accepted principle in biogeography that the distributions of organisms are primarily controlled by the climate1–3; thus it is widely supposed that the geographical distribution limits of plants can be explained in terms of their physiological responses to particular climatic factors. However, such responses have rarely been demonstrated at natural distribution limits3; those responses that are reported generally have such small effects on survival that it is hard to explain how control could really be exercised by them. Those seeking explanations of distribution limits have, however, largely neglected the impermanence of the colonies constituting them. We suggest here that it is necessary to consider not only the effects of the climate on the performance of plants within existing sites but also the impact that these primary effects may have on the invasion of new sites. Epidemic models of the invasion process result in threshold theorems which explain how small changes in plant performance could result in large changes in the probability of new colonies appearing.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Good, R. New Phytol. 30, 149–171 (1931).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cain, S. A. Foundation of Plant Geography (Harper, New York, 1944).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pigott, C. D. in The Flora of a Changing Britain (ed. Perring, F. H.) 32–44 (Botanical Society of the British Isles & Classey, Hampton, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Salisbury, E. J. Geogrl J. 57, 312–335 (1926).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Iversen, J. Geol För. Stockh. Förh. 66, 463–483 (1944).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dahl, E. Oikos 3, 22–52 (1951).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Perring, F. H. & Walters, S. M. (eds) Atlas of the British Flora (Botanical Society of the British Isles & Nelson, Cambridge, 1962).

  8. Conolly, A. P. & Dahl, E. in Studies in the Vegetational History of the British Isles (eds Walker, D. & West, R. G.) 159–223 (Cambridge University Press, London, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ratcliffe, D. N. New Phytol. 67, 365–439 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Davison, A. W. J. Ecol. 58, 453–466 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Climatological Atlas of the British Isles (Meteorological Office, London, 1952).

  12. Pigott, C. D. Weather, Lond. 30, 82–90 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Salisbury, E. J. Trans. Norfolk Norwich Nat. Soc. 13, 191–263 (1932).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Southward, A. J. & Crisp, D. J. J. Anim. Ecol. 23, 163–177 (1954).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Salisbury, E. J. in The Changing Flora of Britain (ed. Lousley, J. E.) 130–139 (Botanical Society of the British Isles, London, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Harper, J. L. Population Biology of Plants (Academic, London, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bailey, N. T. J. The Mathematical Theory of Infectious Diseases (Griffin, London,1975).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Becker, N. Biometrics 35, 295–305 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Levins, R. Lect. Math. Life Sci. 2, 77–107 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kermack, W. O. & McKendrick, A. G. Proc. R. Soc. A115, 700–721 (1927).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Whittle, P. Biometrika 42, 154–162 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Becker, N. Theor. Populat. Biol. 11, 23–36 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. May, R. Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems, 2nd edn (Princeton University Press, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Salisbury, E. J. Weeds and Aliens (Collins, London, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carter, R., Prince, S. Epidemic models used to explain biogeographical distribution limits. Nature 293, 644–645 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1038/293644a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/293644a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing