Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Rebuttal of criticisms of remote viewing experiments

References

  1. Marks, D. Nature 292, 177 (1981).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tart, C. T., Puthoff, H. E. & Targ, R. Nature 284, 191 (1980).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Marks, D. & Kammann, R. The Psychology of the Psychic (Prometheus, New York, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Marks, D. & Kammann, R. Nature 274, 680–681 (1978).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tart, C. T., Puthoff, H. E. & Targ, R. Research in Parapsychology (Scarecrow Press, Metuchen, New Jersey, in the press).

  6. Dunne, B. J. & Bisaha, J. J. Parapsychol. 43, 17–30 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schlitz, M. & Gruber, E. J. Parapsychol. 44, 305–317 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

PUTHOFF, H., TARG, R. Rebuttal of criticisms of remote viewing experiments. Nature 292, 388 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1038/292388a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/292388a0

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing