Letter | Published:

Are archaebacteria merely derived ‘prokaryotes’?

Nature volume 289, pages 9596 (01 January 1981) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

The archaebacteria are a group of prokaryotes which seem as distinct from the true bacteria (eubacteria) as they are from eukaryotes1–4. The evidence on which this conclusion rests is of two types: genotypic (quantitative)—that is, comparative sequence studies, and phenotypic (qualitative)—that is, differences in various organismal characteristics. The differences between archaebacteria and true bacteria are so great, both quantitatively and qualitatively, that the two bacterial groups should be considered as representing separate primary lines of descent, each tracing directly back to the universal ancestor1,4. Furthermore, this ancestor itself seems not to be a prokaryote; rather it was a far simpler type of organism, one properly called a progenote5,6. If this is true, the discovery of archaebacteria marks a major advance in the biologist's attempts to understand the basis for the evolution of the cell.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74, 5088–5090 (1977).

  2. 2.

    , & J. molec. Evol. 11, 245–252 (1978).

  3. 3.

    , , , & Microbiol. Rev. 43, 260–296 (1979).

  4. 4.

    et al. Science 209, 457–463 (1980).

  5. 5.

    Symp. Soc. gen. Microbiol. 20, 39–54 (1970).

  6. 6.

    & J. molec. Evol. 10, 1–6 (1977).

  7. 7.

    & Nature 287, 248–250 (1980).

  8. 8.

    Origin of Eucaryotic Cells (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1970).

  9. 9.

    Symp. Soc. gen. Microbiol. 20, 1–38 (1970).

  10. 10.

    in Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology 8th edn (eds Buchanan, R. E. & Gibbons, N. E.) (Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1974).

  11. 11.

    & Archis Microbiol. 118, 141–152 (1978).

  12. 12.

    Naturwissenschaften 66, 95–107 (1979).

  13. 13.

    & Curr. Microbiol. (in the press).

  14. 14.

    Biochim. biophys. Acta 487, 37–47 (1977).

  15. 15.

    & Science 203, 51–53 (1979).

  16. 16.

    , & Eur. J. Biochem. 96, 597–604 (1979).

  17. 17.

    , & Eur. J. Biochem. 91, 193–199 (1978).

  18. 18.

    , & Biochim. biophys. Acta 431, 550–569 (1976).

  19. 19.

    , & Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 494–498 (1980).

  20. 20.

    , & Nature 286, 460–467 (1980).

  21. 21.

    & Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72, 2310–2314 (1975).

  22. 22.

    & Nature 254, 495–498 (1975).

  23. 23.

    Biochem. Genet. 6, 275–291 (1972).

  24. 24.

    et al. Cell 13, 83–95 (1978).

  25. 25.

    , , & in Ribosomes: Structure, Function, and Genetics (eds Chamblis, G. et al. 297–315 (University Park Press, Baltimore, 1980).

  26. 26.

    & Nature 287, 250–251 (1980).

  27. 27.

    & Can. J. Biochem. 58, 213–218 (1980).

  28. 28.

    Nature 273, 10 (1978).

  29. 29.

    & Nature 273, 101 (1978).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Genetics and Development, 515 Morrill Hall, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801

    • Carl R. Woese
    •  & Ramesh Gupta

Authors

  1. Search for Carl R. Woese in:

  2. Search for Ramesh Gupta in:

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/289095a0

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.