Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Conservation of segmental variants of satellite DNA of Mus musculus in a related species: Mus spretus

Abstract

There has been much recent discussion on the biological function of the highly-repetitive DNAs (satellite DNAs) of higher organisms1–9, that have several curious features of sequence organization. First, some satellite sequences show a high degree of conservation between related species10–15. Second, there is independent evolution of ‘type B’ segments (sequence variants) within a block of tandem repeats16. The majority of the Mus musculus satellite DNA can be cut to produce a type A pattern with either EcoRII or AvaII (ref. 8). However, digestion of M. musculus satellite with other enzymes produces a limit series of fragments from only part of the total satellite (type B segment)16. To understand the significance of the segmental sequence variants, it is necessary to characterize their distribution between individual chromosomes of a genome18 and between closely related genomes. We report here the distribution of type A and B patterns in the two closely related species, Mus musculus and Mus spretus19,20. The data show that the genome of M. spretus contains homologous sequences that are organized into the same type B segments as M. musculus, except for one type B segment that is under-represented in M. spretus. From a knowledge of the genetic distance and hybrid fertility between these species19,20, we are able to exclude one of the proposed biological roles for these particular genomic components.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jones, K. Nature 255, 912–915 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. John, B., Miklos, G. L. G. Int. Rev. Cyt. 58, 1–114 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Peacock, W. J. et al. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 42, 1121–1136 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Beauchamp, R. S., Mitchell, A. R., Buckland, R. A. & Bostock, C. J. Chromosoma 71, 153–166 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yamamoto, M. & Miklos, G. L. G. Chromosoma 66, 71–98 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Singh, L., Purdom, I. F. & Jones, K. W. Chromosoma 71, 167–181 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith, G. P. Science 191, 528–535 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Southern, E. M. J. molec. Biol. 94, 51–69 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Musich, P. R., Maio, J. J. & Brown, F. L. J. molec. Biol. 117, 657–677 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fry, K. & Salser, W. Cell 12, 1069–1084 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Barnes, S. R., Webb, D. A. & Dover, G. A. Chromosoma 67, 341–363 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gall, J. G. & Atherton, D. D. J. molec. Biol. 85, 633–664 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Manuelidis, L. & Wu, J. C. Nature 276, 92–94 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gosden, J. R., Mitchell, A. R., Seuanez, H. N. & Gosden, C. M. Chromosoma 63, 253–271 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Donehower, L. & Gillespie, D. J. molec. Biol. 134, 805–834 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Horz, W. & Zachau, H. G. Eur. J. Biochem. 73, 383–392 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Brown, S. D. M. & Dover, G. A. Nucleic Acids Res. 6, 2423–2434 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Brown, S. D. M. & Dover, G. A. Nucleic Acids Res. 8, 781–792 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bonhomme, F., Martin, S. & Thaler, L. Experientia 34, 1140 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Britton, J. & Thaler, L. Biochem. Genet. 16, 213–225 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Manuelidis, L. Analyt. Biochem. 78, 561–568 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rigby, P. W. J., Dieckmann, M., Rhodes, C. & Berg, P. J. molec. Biol. 113, 237–251 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Southern, E. M. J. molec. Biol. 98, 503–517 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bedbrook, J. R., Jones, J., O'Dell, M., Thompson, R. D. & Flavell, R. B. Cell 19, 545–560 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, S., Dover, G. Conservation of segmental variants of satellite DNA of Mus musculus in a related species: Mus spretus. Nature 285, 47–49 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1038/285047a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/285047a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing