Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Is 3′-nucleotide rigid?

Abstract

Conformational analysis of nucleic acids and polynucleotides is far more complex than that of proteins and polypeptides, due to five single bond rotations in addition to the sugar puckerings in the monomer. Sundaralingam1 proposed the concept of the ‘rigid’ nucleotides from analysis of crystal structure data, with the flexibility allowed only about the phosphodiester bonds. However, the crystal structure of deoxyguanosine-5′–phosphate2,3 indicates at gt conformation about the C-4′–C-5′ bond against gg in a conformationally rigid nudeotide1. Jack et al.4 considered the flexibility of nucleotides in tRNA about the C-4′–C-5′ bond, thereby introducing the concept of ‘non-rigid’ ribonucleotides. Conformational flexibility of the f uranose ring in DNA and RNA and their energetics using classical and quantum chemical methods have been reported5–8. We have examined the flexibility of 3′-nucleotides. α, the most important of the conformational parameters defining the 3′-end of a nucleotide unit9, has a value in the range 195°–270° in all the 3′-nucleotides, dinucleoside monophosphates and higher oligomers which have been surveyed. A survey of the proposed structures of polyribonudeotides10,11 also shows the values of a to be greater than 200°. However, the structures proposed for B-DNA by Arnott and Hukins12,13 and D-DNA by Arnott et al.14 have values of α of 155° and 141° respectively, much lower than the lowest observed value. The structure for B-DNA has two strong, short contacts (C-2′…OP-1 = 2.64 Å and HC-2″…OP-1 = 1.79 Å) which lead to an energetically unfavourable conformation. Hence, it is of interest to investigate whether, by allowing flexibility to the sugar moiety in the nucleotide unit, it is possible to make the structure energetically favourable. Here, conformational energy calculations were carried out to determine the range of α which would give rise to energetically favoured conformations with different sugar puckerings. Our analysis has shown that the theoretically obtained range is nearly the same as the preferred range in crystals, indicating the flexibility of the 3′-nucleotides.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sundaralingam, M. in 5th Jerusalem Symp. Quantum Chem. Biochem. (eds Bergmann, E. D. & Pullman, B) 417–455 (Academic, New York, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Young, D. W., Tollin, P. & Wilson, H. R. Nature 248, 513–514 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Viswamitra, M. A. & Seshadri, T. P. Nature 252, 176–177 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jack, A., Klug, A. & Ladner, J. E. Nature 261, 250–251 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Levitt, M. & Warshel, A. J. Am. chem. Soc. 100, 2607–2613 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pullman, B. & Saran, A. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. molec. Biol. 18, 215–322 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sasisekharan, V. in 5th Jerusalem Symp. Quantum Chem. Biochem. (eds Bergmann, E. D. & Pullman, B.) 247–260 (Academic, New York, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pattabiraman, N. n, N. thesis, Indian Inst. of Science, Bangalore (1979).

  9. Seeman, N. C., Rosenberg, J.M., Suddath, F. L., Kim, J. J. P. & Rich, A. J. molec. Biol 104, 109–144 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Arnott, S., Hukins, D. W. L., Dover, S. D., Fuller, W. & Hodgson, A. R. J. molec. Biol. 81, 107–122 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Arnott, S., Chandrasekharan, R. & Seising, E. in Structure and Conformation of Nucleic Acids and Protein-Nucleic Acid Interactions 577–596 (University Park Press, Baltimore, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Arnott, S. & Hukins, D. W. L. Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun. 47, 1504–1509 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Arnott, S. & Hukins, D. W. L. J. molec. Biol. 81, 93–107 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Arnott, S., Chandrasekharan, R., Hukins, D. W. L., Smith, R. S. C. & Watts, L. J. molec. Biol. 88, 523–533 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lakshminarayanan, A. V. & Sasisekharan, V. Biopolymers 8, 475–488 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sasisekharan, V. & Pattabiraman, N. Nature 275, 159–162 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Arnott, S., Dover, S. D. & /Wonacott, A. Acta crystallogr. B25, 2192–2206 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Marvin, D. A., Spencer, M., Wilkins, M. F. H. & Hamilton, L. D. J. molec. Biol. 3, 547–565 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pattabiraman, N., Rao, S. & Sasisekharan, V. Is 3′-nucleotide rigid?. Nature 284, 187–189 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1038/284187a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/284187a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing