Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Influence of local vascularity on hormone receptors in mammary gland

Abstract

Procedures, such as teat removal (thelectomy) or teat duct ligation, which prevent removal of milk, lead to rapid involution of the lactating mammary gland; performed unilaterally they have been used previously to study the biochemistry of involution1–3, enabling a comparison of normal and involuting glands in the same animal against the same systematic hormonal environment. Both the protein hormone prolactin and the steroid hormone oestrogen are of importance in the development and function of the mammary gland4. In the present experiments, female Sprague–Dawley rats were unilaterally thelectomised and the binding to the mammary gland of prolactin and oestrogen was examined through pregnancy, lactation and weaning. There was an effect of thelectomy during lactation only, when levels of both receptors increased in the intact lactating gland but failed to rise in the thelectomised, involuting gland. Capillary closure is known to occur in the mammary glands of rats after 36–48 h of milk accumulation5. The rate of delivery of hormones to the tissue will be drastically reduced and it is concluded that this, rather than systemic hormone levels, is of importance in controlling receptor levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McLean, P. Biochem. J. 90, 271–278 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jones, E. A. Biochim. biophys. Acta 177, 158–160 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamosh, M., Clary, T. R., Chernick, S. S. & Scow, R. O. Biochim. biophys. Acta 210, 473–482 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lyons, W. R. Proc. R. Soc. B149, 303–325 (1958).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Silver, I. A. J. Physiol., Lond. 133, 65–66P (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hayden, T. J., Bonney, R. C. & Forsyth, I. A. J. Endocr. 80, 259–269 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Holcomb, H. H., Costlow, M. E., Buschow, R. A. & McGuire, W. L. Biochim. biophys. Acta 428, 104–112 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith, R. D., Hilf, R. & Senior, A. E. Cancer Res. 36, 3726–3731 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bohnet, H. G., Gomez, F. & Friesen, H. G. Endocrinology 101, 1111–1121 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gardner, D. G. & Whitliff, J. L. Biochim. biophys. Acta 320, 617–627 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hsueh, A. J. W., Peck, E. J. & Clark, J. H. J. Endocr. 58, 503–511 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Leung, B. S., Jack, W. M. & Reiney, C. G. J. Steroid Biochem. 7, 89–95 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Forsyth, I. A. & Hayden, T. J. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 41, 135–163 (1977).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Leung, B. S. & Saski, G. H. Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun. 55, 1180–1187 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hanwell, A. & Linzell, J. L. J. Physiol., Lond. 233, 111–125 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chatwin, A. L., Linzell, J. L. & Setchell, B. P. J. Endocr. 44, 247–254 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gullino, P. M. J. natn. Cancer Inst. 61, 639–643 (1978).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hartree, E. F. Analyt. Biochem. 48, 422–427 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moore, B., Forsyth, I. Influence of local vascularity on hormone receptors in mammary gland. Nature 284, 77–78 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1038/284077a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/284077a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing