Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

X-ray diffraction from the side-by-side model of DNA

Abstract

An intriguing topological problem posed by the double-helical Watson–Crick1 model of DNA is that of unwinding the intertwined strands during replication. Several workers have recently proposed novel side-by-side (SBS) structures for DNA2–6. In all these models the two strands are joined by complementary Watson–Crick base pairs and the antiparallel polynucleotide strands alternate between short segments of right- and left-handed helix, thus both reducing the amount of intertwining and alleviating the unwinding problem. We show here that there are unacceptable discrepancies between the observed diffraction pattern of B-DNA7 and that calculated for the original SBS structure2. We also describe a simple modification of this model which resolves some of the more serious discrepancies. However, the agreement is still markedly inferior to that obtained for a Watson–Crick model of DNA.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Watson, J. D. & Crick, F. H. C. Nature 171, 737–740 (1953).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rodley, G. A., Scobie, R. S., Bates, R. H. T. & Lewitt, R. M. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 73, 2959–2963 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sasisekharan, V. & Pattabiraman, N. Curr. Sci. 45, 779–783 (1976); Nature 275, 159–162 (1978).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sasisekharan, V., Pattabiraman, N. & Gupta, G. Curr. Sci. 46,763–764 (1977); Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75, 4092–4096 (1978).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cyriax, B. & Gäth, R. Naturwissenschaften 65, 106–108 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pohl, W. F. & Roberts, G. W. J. math. Biol. 6, 383–402 (1978).

    Article  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Langridge, R. et al., J. molec. Biol. 2, 38–64 (1960).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Arnott, S. Nature 278, 780–781 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cochran, W., Crick, F. H. C. & Vand, V. Acta crystallogr. 5, 581–586 (1952).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Arnott, S. & Hukins, D. W. L. Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun. 47, 1504–1509 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fuller, W., Wilkins, M. H. F., Wilson, H. R., Hamilton, L. D. & Arnott, S. J. molec. Biol. 12, 60–80 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greenall, R., Pigram, W. & Fuller, W. X-ray diffraction from the side-by-side model of DNA. Nature 282, 880–882 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/282880a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/282880a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing