Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Delayed implantation is under environmental control in the badger (Meles meles L.)

Abstract

IN the wild state, the European badger (Meles meles L.) becomes pregnant once a year during a post-partum oestrus in February or March1. Fertilisation is followed, at the blastocyst stage of development, by a prolonged embryonic diapause which ends, when implantation occurs, in December or January. Implantation is thus delayed, for 10 months2 and it may be assumed, in accordance with Fries's hypothesis3, that the resumption of development in the winter is a genetically determined and adaptive phenomenon which results in birth during the spring when conditions for the young are most favourable. This pattern suggests that the time of implantation is related to some environmental factor such as photoperiod or temperature. To test this hypothesis, wild female badgers were captured in their set after fecundation and maintained during summer in conditions of ‘artificial winter’. We report here that in such conditions implantation, gestation and birth can be brought forward 4 months.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Canivenc, R. & Laffargue, M. C.r. Soc. Biol. 150, 1193–1196 (1956).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Canivenc, R. C.r. Acad. Sci. hebd. Séanc. 246, 1914–1917 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fries, S. Zool. Anz. 3, 486 (1880).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bonnin, M., Canivenc, R. & Ribes, C. J. reprod. Fert. 52, 55–58 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zuckermann, S. Ciba Fdn. Colloq. Endocr. 3, 213–228 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sadleir, R. M. F. S. The Ecology of Reproduction in Wild and Domestic Mammals (Methuen, London, 1969).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Aulerich, R. S., Holcomb, L., Ringer, R. K. & Schaible, P. J. Q. Bull. Mich. State. Univ. agric. Exp. Stn 46, 132–138 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Belaiev, D. K., Klotchov, D. V. & Zhelova, A. J. Byull. mosk. Obshch. Ispyt, Prir., Otd Biol. 78, 107–125 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Allais, C. & Martinet, L. J. reprod. Fert. 54 137–143 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Enders, R. V. & Pearson, O. P. Am. Fur. Breeder 15, 18–19 (1943).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Canivenc, R., Bonnin-Laffargue, M. & Lajus-Boue, M. C.r. Acad. Sci. hebd. séanc. 264, 1486–1489 (1967).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

CANIVENC, R., BONNIN, M. Delayed implantation is under environmental control in the badger (Meles meles L.). Nature 278, 849–850 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/278849a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/278849a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing