Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Energy implications of future stabilization of atmospheric CO2 content

Abstract

The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change1 calls for “stabilization of greenhouse-gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system . . . ”. A standard baseline scenario2,3 that assumes no policy intervention to limit greenhouse-gas emissions has 10 TW (10 × 1012 watts) of carbon-emission-free power being produced by the year 2050, equivalent to the power provided by all today's energy sources combined. Here we employ a carbon-cycle/energy model to estimate the carbon-emission-free power needed for various atmospheric CO2 stabilization scenarios. We find that CO2 stabilization with continued economic growth will require innovative, cost-effective and carbon-emission-free technologies that can provide additional tens of terawatts of primary power in the coming decades, and certainly by the middle of the twenty-first century, even with sustained improvement in the economic productivity of primary energy. At progressively lower atmospheric CO2-stabilization targets in the 750–350 p.p.m.v. range, implementing stabilization will become even more challenging because of the increasing demand for carbon-emission-free power. The magnitude of the implied infrastructure transition suggests the need for massive investments in innovative energy research.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Evolution of factors governing the rate of global fossil-fuel carbon emissions in the Kaya identity: cN(GDP/N)(Ė/GDP)(C/E).
Figure 2: Fossil-fuel carbon emissions and primary power in the twenty-first century for IPCC IS92a and WRE stabilization scenarios.
Figure 3: Twenty-first century trade-offs, between carbon-free power required and “energy efficiency”, to stabilize at twice the pre-industrial CO2 concentration. Carbon-free primary power is plotted versus the annual rate of decline in energy intensity.

References

  1. 1

    United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (Text) (UNEP/WMO, Climate Change Secretariat, Geneva, 1992).

  2. 2

    Leggett, J. et al. in Climatic Change 1992: the Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment (eds Houghton, J. T. et al.) 69–95 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Houghton, J. T. et al. (eds) Climate Change 1995: the Science of Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Kaya, Y. Impact of carbon dioxide emission control on GNP growth: Interpretation of proposed scenarios (IPCC Response Strategies Working Group Memorandum, 1989).

  5. 5

    Nakićenović, N., Victor, D., Grübler, A. & Schrattenholtzer, L. Long term strategies for mitigating global warming: Introduction. Energy 18, 403–409 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Hoffert, M. I. & Potter, S. D. in Engineering Response to Global Climate Change (ed. Watts, R. G.) 205–260 (Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    de Vries, B. & van den Wijngaart, R. The Targets/IMage Energy (TIME) 1.0 Model (GLOBO Rep. Ser. No. 16, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Nakićenović, N. Freeing energy from carbon. Daedalus 125(3), 95–112 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Boden, T. A. et al. (eds) Trends 93: A Compendium of Data on Global Change 501–584 (ORNL/CDIA-65, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Lab., Oak Ridge, TN, 1994).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Alcamo, J. et al. in Climate Change 1994 (eds Houghton, J. T. et al.) 247–304 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Alcamo, J. (ed.) Image 2.0: Integrated Modeling of Global Climate Change (Kluwer, Netherlands, 1994).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Pepper, W. J. et al. Emission Scenarios for the IPCC—An Update (US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Yang, C. & Schneider, S. H. Global carbon dioxide scenarios: sensitivity to social and technological factors in three regions. Mitigat. Adapt. Strat. for Global Change 2, 373–404 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Reddy, A. K. N. & Goldemberg, J. in Energy for Planet Earth (ed. Piel, J.) 59–71 (Freeman, New York, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Goldemberg, J. Energy needs in developing countries and sustainability. Science 269, 1058–1059 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Wigley, T. M. L., Richels, R. & Edmonds, J. A. Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2concentration. Nature 379, 240–243 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Jain, A. K., Kheshgi, H. S., Hoffert, M. I. & Wuebbles, D. J. Distribution of radiocarbon as a test of global carbon cycle models. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 9, 153–166 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Romm, J., Levine, M., Brown, M. & Peterson, E. Aroad map for U.S. carbon reductions. Science 279, 669–670 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    National Academy of Sciences Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming 340–375 (National Academy Press, WashingtonD, 1992).

  20. 20

    Parson, E. A. & Keith, D. W. Fossil fuels without CO2emissions: Progress, prospects and policy implications. Science (in the press).

  21. 21

    Steinberg, M. & Dong, Y. in Global Climate Change: Science, Policy and Mitigation Strategies (eds Mathai, C. V. & Stensland, C.) 858–873 (Air & Waste Management Assoc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Marland, G. (ed.) Special section on geoengineering. Clim. Change 33(3), 275–336 (1996).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Flannery, B. P. et al. in Engineering Response to Global Climate Change (ed. Watts, R. G.) 379–427 (Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Fogg, M. J. Terraforming: Engineering Planetary Environments (SAE International, Warrendale, PA, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Schneider, S. H. & Goulder, L. H. Achieving low-cost emission targets. Nature 389, 13–14 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Johansson, T. M. et al. (eds) Renewable Energy (Island, Washington DC, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Glaser, P. E. et al. (eds) Solar Power Satellites: A Space Energy System for Earth (Wiley-Praxis, Chichester, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Weinberg, A. M. in Technologies For a Greenhouse-Constrained Society (eds Kuliasha, M. A. et al.) 227–237 (Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Fowler, T. K. The Fusion Quest (Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Grüber, A. in Technological Trajectories and the Human Environment (eds Ausubel, J. H. & Langford, H. D.) 14–32 (National Academy Press, Washington DC, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank DOE, NASA and NSF for partial support of this work. We also thank the Aspen Global Change Institute for discussions during the 1998 summer workshop ‘Innovative Energy Systems and CO2 Stabilization’.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin I. Hoffert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoffert, M., Caldeira, K., Jain, A. et al. Energy implications of future stabilization of atmospheric CO2 content. Nature 395, 881–884 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/27638

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing