Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Genetic regulation of glucose phosphate isomerase in mouse oocytes

Abstract

THE enzyme glucose phosphate isomerase (GPI; D-glucose-6-phosphate-ketol isomerase EC 5.3.1.9.) catalyses the interconversion of fructose-6-phosphate and glucose-6-phosphate. In mice, the product of the GPI structural gene is a monomer and the enzymatically active dimer results from monomer aggregation1,2. In inbred strains, GPI is found in either of two electrophoretically distinct forms: GPI-1AA or GPI-1BB (ref. 2). Theoretically, the random association of equal numbers of A and B monomers will result in dimers in the proportion of 25%AA:50%AB:25%BB, and indeed an activity distribution of these proportions is observed when samples of purified AA and BB forms, equal in enzymatic activity are dissociated and reassociated in vitro3. It follows, then, that (1) monomer aggregation is a random process which does not distinguish the monomer types; (2) the electrophoretic forms of GPI are similar enzymatically; (3) the measured activity is linearly proportional to the amount of enzyme. Therefore, the 25%AA:50%AB:25%BB activity distribution of GPI found in the mature tissues of heterozygous mice (Gpi-1a/b) (ref. 4) indicates that the a and b alleles are equally expressed. However, we show here that this is not the rule for unfertilised ova, for we have observed differences in the expression of GPI in unfertilised ova from the inbred mouse strains DBA/2J, LP/J and C57BL/6J. Mature somatic tissues do not reveal these interstrain differences. We postulate that the amount of GPI in ova is controlled by a cis-active regulator gene linked to the GPI structural locus. This is apparently the first characterisation of a genetic variation affecting the amount of an enzyme in the mouse ovum and it provides a unique opportunity for further exploration of gene regulation during mammalian development.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carter, N. D. & Parr, C. W. Nature 216, 511 (1967).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. DeLorenzo, R. J. & Ruddle, F. H. Biochem. Genet. 3, 151 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Carter, N. D. & Yoshida, A. Biochim. biophys. Acta 181, 468–470 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Peterson, A. C., Frair, P. M. & Wong, G. Biochem. Genet, (in the press).

  5. Paigen, K., Swank, R. T., Tomino, S. & Ganschow, R. E. J. Cell Physiol. 85, 379 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sorensen, R. A. & Wasserman, P. M. Devl Biol. 50, 531–536 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stevens, W. L. J. Genet. 43, 301–307 (1942).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Padua, R. A., Bulfield, G. & Peters, J. Biochem. Genet. 16, 127–143 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Epstein, C. L. Biol. Reprod. 12, 82–105 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Epstein, C. J. & Smith, S. A. Devl Biol. 33, 171–184 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Brinster, R. L. J. Reprod. Fert. 17, 139–146 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chapman, V. M., Whitten, W. K. & Ruddle, F. H. Devl Biol. 26, 153–158 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Brinster, R. L. Biochem. Genet. 9, 187–191 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

PETERSON, A., WONG, G. Genetic regulation of glucose phosphate isomerase in mouse oocytes. Nature 276, 267–269 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/276267a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/276267a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing