Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Phase-locking in goldfish saccular nerve fibres accounts for frequency discrimination capacities

Abstract

THE auditory systems of fishes have been of particular interest in the development of auditory theory because a mechanical analysis of frequency had seemed unlikely on the basis of the ear's rather undifferentiated structural organisation1. Thus, at the level of the 8th nerve, information about stimulus frequency is thought to be coded in the temporal structure of neural activity rather than in across-fibre distributions of impulse rate2–4. However, recent neurophysiological data show that a limited peripheral frequency analysis occurs in several species5–7 and some workers have suggested that this may form the basis for psychophysical demonstrations of filtering8–10 and for frequency discrimination in the fish auditory system11,12. Such a ‘place principle’ of frequency analysis and pitch perception is presently generally believed to originate in the phyletic series among the amphibia and to reach the greatest degree of elaboration with the mammals13. We report here an experiment which helps to resolve this question of frequency codings by evaluating the adequacy of the temporal hypothesis to account for the behaviourally measured frequency difference limens for the goldfish11,12. A simple form of the temporal coding hypothesis states that the reciprocal of stimulus frequency (period) is represented in 8th nerve fibres as the distribution of time intervals between phase-locked impulses4. A discrimination between two different period lengths may thus entail a decision as to whether the two resulting distributions of neural interspike intervals are the same or different. Clearly, the performance on such a discrimination would be limited by the variability of the distributions, or the accuracy with which neural impulses are phase-locked to the stimulating waveform. We demonstrate here that the neurones which phase-lock best at any given frequency show degrees of phase-locking accuracy that would be expected if the central nervous system were processing the input optimally.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. von Frisch, K. Z. vergl. Physiol. 25, 703–747 (1938).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwartzkopff, J. in Sound Reception in Fish (eds Shuijf, A. & Hawkins, A.) (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  3. van Heel, D. Experentia 15, 75–76 (1956).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wever, E. G. Theory of Hearing (Wiley, New York, 1949).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Furukawa, T. & Ishii, Y. J. Neurophysiol. 30, 1377–1403 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Enger, P. S. Acta physiol. scand. 59, Suppl., 1–48 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fay, R. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 63, 136–146 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hawkins, A. & Chapman, C. J. comp. Physiol. 103, 209–226 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tavolga, W. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 55, 1323–1333 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Popper, A. & Clarke, N. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 53, 11–18 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fay, R. R. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 73, 175–180 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jacobs, D. & Tavolga, W. Anim. Behav. 16, 67–71 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wever, E. G. in Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol. 5 (eds Keidel, W. D. & Neff, W. D.) 423–454 (Springer, Berlin, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fay, R. R. J. audit. Res. 9, 112–121 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rose, J., Brugge, J., Anderson, D. & Hind, J. J. Neurophysiol. 30, 769–793 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Anderson, D. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 54, 361–364 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gumble, E., Greenwood, J. & Durand, D. J. Am. statist. Ass. 48, 131–152 (1953).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mountcastle, V., Sakata, H., Talbot, W. & Hyvarinen, J. J. Neurophysiol. 32, 452–484 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Green, D. & Swets, J. in Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics (Kreiger, New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fay, R. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 62, 588 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

FAY, R. Phase-locking in goldfish saccular nerve fibres accounts for frequency discrimination capacities. Nature 275, 320–322 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/275320a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/275320a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing