Abstract
WALRAVEN AND HAYMES1 have reported the possible detection of a ∼1.16 MeV γ-ray line at a flux level of (3.4±1.5)×10−3 photons cm−2 s−1 from a point in the galactic plane (l = 345°, b = 5°). If correct this could be an enormously important result constituting the first direct confirmation of theories of explosive nucleosynthesis (ref. 2 and refs therein). Clayton et al.3–4 have predicted that the most intense γ-ray line to be emitted from the radioactive debris of a typical supernova after ∼3 yr will be the 1.156 MeV line from the decay of 44Ti (τ1/2 = 48 yr). However, the reported detection was at a marginal level of statistical significance (2.6σ). It was mainly the “remarkable double coincidence that just the theoretically-predicted spectral anomaly occurred” when the telescope was pointed at a region of the galactic plane believed to contain young supernova remnants, that encouraged these workers to report this result. Clearly an independent attempt to confirm this observation with a telescope of finer energy resolution is called for. Here we report the result of such an attempt. Our conclusion is that the reported positive detection was probably a statistical fluctuation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Walraven, G. D. & Haymes, R. C. Nature 264, 42 (1976).
Schramm, D. N. & Arnett, W. D. (eds) Explosive Nucleosynthesis (University of Texas Press, Austin, 1973).
Clayton, D. D., Colgate, S. A. & Fishman, G. J. Astrophys. J. 155, 75 (1969).
Clayton, D. D. in Explosive Nucleosynthesis 264 (University of Texas Press, Austin, 1973).
Leventhal, M., MacCallum, C. J. & Watts, A. C. Nature 266, 696 (1977).
Leventhal, M., MacCallum, C. J. & Watts, A. C. Astrophys. J. 216, 491 (1977).
Ramaty, R. & Lingenfelter, R. E. Astrophys. J. Lett. 213, L5 (1977).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
LEVENTHAL, M., MACCALLUM, C. & STANG, P. Search for the 1.2 MeV γ-ray line of Walraven and Haymes. Nature 275, 200 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/275200a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/275200a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.