Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Spectral sensitivity of the red and yellow oil droplet fields of the pigeon (Columba livia)

Abstract

THE function of the brightly coloured oil droplets situated within the cone receptors of the avian retina has long been the subject of debate1–4. Among other hypotheses it has been suggested that they reduce glare and chromatic abberation1, remove unwanted short-wavelength sensitivity2, and have a role in colour vision3–5. The transmission spectra of the droplets in the visible spectrum are typically those of short wavelength cut-off filters5,6–8, due to the presence in high concentration of carotenoids of dietry origin9–11. Recent evidence from microspectrophotometry suggests that the droplets filter the light reaching the visual pigment in the receptor's outer segment, resulting in the modification of the sensitivity functions of some of the individual receptors, from the broad band sensitivity of the visual pigment alone to a narrow band one12,13. It is also known that marked differences occur in the proportions of the variously coloured droplets between species, and also between different parts of the retina of a given species4,14–16. In the pigeon (Columba livia) the retina is divided into two distinct areas, known as the red and yellow fields, defined by their oil droplet populations. The red field is in the dorsal retina (frontal–ventral visual field), whereas the yellow field is in the ventral retina (dorsal visual field): the two fields differ in both the type and number of broad and narrow band receptors present, as well as in receptor density and the neural complexity of the retina13,17,18. We report here clear differences in the photopic spectral sensitivity of the two fields, determined behaviourally, and suggest that these reflect a difference in the colour vision mechanisms of the two areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Walls, G. L. & Judd, H. D. Br. J. Ophthal. 17, 641–675 (1933).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wolbarsht, M. L. Fedn Proc. 35, 44–50 (1976).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bloch, S. & Maturana, H. R. Nature 234, 284–285 (1971).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Muntz, W. R. A. in Handbook of Sensory Physiology VII/1 (ed. Dartnall, H. J. A.) 529–565 (Springer, Berlin, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  5. King-Smith, P. E. Vision Res. 9, 1391–1399 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fujimoto, K., Yanase, T. & Hanaoka, T. Jap. J. Physiol. 7, 339–346 (1957).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Strother, G. K. & Wolken, J. J. Expl cell. Res. 21, 504–512 (1960).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Leibman, P. E. in Handbook of Sensory Physiology VII/1 (ed. Dartnall, H. J. A.) 481–528 (Springer, Berlin, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wald, G. & Zussman, H. Nature 140, 197 (1937).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Leibman, P. A. & Granda, A. M. Nature 253, 370–372 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Meyer, D. B. Ophthalm. Res. 2, 104–109 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bowmaker, J. K. & Knowles, A. Vision Res. 17, 755–764 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bowmaker, J. K. Vision Res. 17, 1129–1138 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Peiponen, V. A. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 1, 281–302 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Waelchli, G. Archs Ophthalm. 29, 205–233 (1883).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Galifret, Y. Zeit. Für Zellforschung. 86, 535–545 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yazulla, S. J. comp. Neurol. 153, 309–324 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Clarke, P. G. H. & Whitteridge, D. Q. Jl exp. Physiol. 6, 351–358 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Martin, G. R. & Muntz, W. R. A. in Neural Mechanisms of Behaviour in the Pigeon (ed. Granda, A. M. & Maxwell, J. H.) (Plenum, New York, in the press).

  20. Blough, D. S. J. opt. Soc. Am. 47, 827–833 (1957).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Romeskie, M. & Yager, D. Vision Res. 16, 501–505 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Abramov, I. in Handbook of Sensory Physiology VII/2 (ed. Fuortes, M. G. F.) 567–607 (Springer, Berlin, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MARTIN, G., MUNTZ, W. Spectral sensitivity of the red and yellow oil droplet fields of the pigeon (Columba livia). Nature 274, 620–621 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/274620a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/274620a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing