Letter | Published:

Should Hubble's constant be doubled?

Naturevolume 274pages449450 (1978) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

LYNDEN-BELL1 has argued that Hubble's constant H0 should be doubled, from its present notional value of 55 km s−1 Mpc−1 to 110 km s−1 Mpc−1. He claims that with this value of H0 the apparent superluminal expansions in compact radio sources can be explained in a more consistent manner than previously, by means of his model of the expansion based on the old ‘light echo’ theory used to explain the Nova Persei phenomenon of 1901. Lynden-Bell's conclusion is heavily dependent on his special interpretation of the expansion phenomena in the source 3C120. Here I revert to the interpretation previously presented by Cohen et al.2 and use a more general ‘energy echo’ model that allows the primary energy ejected from the source nucleus to be propagated with a speed vc, with Lynden-Bell's case v = c as a limiting possibility. The primary energy may therefore be in the form of relativistic particles, plasmoids, shock waves or photons.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Lynden-Bell, D. Nature 270, 396 (1977).

  2. 2

    Cohen, M. H. et al. Nature 268, 405 (1977).

  3. 3

    Longair, M. S., Ryle, M. & Scheuer, P. A. G. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 164, 243 (1973).

  4. 4

    Hargrave, P. J. & Ryle, M. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 166, 305 (1974).

  5. 5

    Blandford, R. D. & McKee, C. F. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 180, 343 (1977).

  6. 6

    Readhead, A. C. S., Cohen, M. H. & Blandford, R. D. Nature 272, 131 (1978).

  7. 7

    Anderson, B. et al. Nature 271, 636 (1978).

Download references

Author information

Author notes

    • W. DAVIDSON

    Present address: Astronomy Centre, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, UK

Affiliations

  1. University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

    • W. DAVIDSON

Authors

  1. Search for W. DAVIDSON in:

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Issue Date

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/274449a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.