Letter | Published:

Behaviour and speciation of dissolved selenium in estuarine waters


THE behaviour of chemical species in estuaries1 is important for several reasons. The extent of any modification of the riverborne flux of dissolved materials to the open sea, as a result of interactions during the mixing of fresh and saline waters, is of fundamental geochemical significance. Knowledge of the pathways of element transference in estuaries is needed to predict effects of waste inputs and other modifications of estuarine conditions. It is also in the estuarine zone that the limitations of the determination and modelling of chemical speciation become most acute, because of the wide range of major compositional variables and the importance of kinetic factors. Among the major problems is the uncertainty as to the true redox potentials of natural waters and the factors which can lead to the presence of thermodynamically unstable oxidation states. Recent work2,3 on selenium in seawater has indicated that the redox speciation of this element shows some differences from that predicted for an equilibrium system. We give here results of measurements of selenium in some river and estuarine waters of the Solent area. Available Se(IV) was detected in chalk streams but always accounted for less than 10% of the total dissolved selenium. Dissolved forms of selenium behaved essentially conservatively during estuarine mixing of chalk stream inputs.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1

    Burton, J. D. & Liss, P. S. (eds) Estuarine Chemistry (Academic, London, 1976).

  2. 2

    Sugimura, Y., Suzuki, Y. & Miyake, Y. J. oceanogr. Soc. Japan 32, 235–241 (1976).

  3. 3

    Yoshii, O., Hiraki, K., Nishikawa, Y. & Shigematsu, T. Bunseki Kagaku 26, 91–96 (1977).

  4. 4

    Holliday, L. M. & Liss, P. S. Estuarine coastal mar. Sci. 4, 349–353 (1976).

  5. 5

    Moore, R. M. thesis, Southampton Univ. (1978).

  6. 6

    Measures, C. I. thesis, Southampton Univ. (1978).

  7. 7

    Shimoishi, Y. Analytica chim. Acta 64, 465–468 (1973).

  8. 8

    Gosink, T. A. & Reynolds, D. J. Mar. Sci. Comm. 1, 101–114 (1975).

  9. 9

    Armstrong, F. A. J., Williams, P. M. & Strickland, J. D. H. Nature 211, 481–483 (1966).

  10. 10

    Shuali, U., Ottolenghi, M., Rabani, J. & Yelin, Z. J. phys. Chem. 73, 3445–3451 (1969).

  11. 11

    Leutwein, F. in Handbook of Geochemistry (ed. Wedepohl, K. H.) 2, Sections 34-G and 34-H (Springer, Berlin, 1972).

  12. 12

    Sillén, L. in Oceanography (ed. Sears, M.) 549–581 (AAAS, Washington, D.C., 1961).

  13. 13

    Breck, W. G. in The Sea 5 (ed. Goldberg, E. D.) 153–179 (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1974).

  14. 14

    Kharkar, D. P., Turekian, K. K. & Bertine, K. K. Geochim. cosmochim. Acta 32, 285–298 (1968).

  15. 15

    Hiraki, K., Nishikawa, Y. & Shigematsu, T. Abstr. 26th int. Congr. pure appl. Chem. Part 1, 413 (1977).

  16. 16

    Miyake, Y., Sugimura, Y. & Suzuki, Y. Abstr. 26th int. Congr. pure appl. Chem. Part 1, 414 (1977).

  17. 17

    Turekian, K. K. in Handbook of Geochemistry (ed. Wedepohl, K. H.) 1, 297–323 (Springer, Berlin, 1969).

  18. 18

    Livingstone, D. A. Prof. Pap. U.S. Geol. Surv. 440-G,

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.