Letter | Published:

Evidence for a C-terminal tyrosine residue in human and mouse B-lymphocyte membrane μ chains

Nature volume 272, pages 555557 (06 April 1978) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

THE antigen receptor on the plasma membrane of both human and murine bone marrow-derived (B) lymphocytes has been shown to be mainly monomeric IgM (refs 1–5), but the mechanism of attachment of this IgM is not known. Studies on other membrane proteins (for example, glycophorin6, cytochrome b5, (ref. 7) and probably HLA8) have shown that they are bound to the membrane by means of a hydrophobic polypeptide stretch in the C-terminal region, but secreted IgM heavy chains terminate in an extra-domain sequence of 19 amino acid residues9–11, which is not sufficiently hydrophobic to act as an integral membrane component. Membrane μ chains, however, might carry a further hydrophobic C-terminal polypeptide section instead of, or in addition to, the C-terminal stretch present in secreted μ chains. To investigate this possibility, we have exploited the fact that a tyrosine residue forms the C terminus of all examined secreted μ chains, including those of human and mouse. Since it is improbable that a hydrophobic extension on the membrane μ chain would coincidentally carry a C-terminal tyrosine residue, we have examined the surface IgM from a murine B lymphocytoma, McPc 1748 (ref. 12), and a human lymphocytic B-cell line, Bristol-8 (Bri-8, obtained from G. D. Searle, High Wycombe), which also carries surface IgM (F. Kramer, personal communication), to see whether a C-terminal tyrosine residue can be cleaved from their purified μ chains by treatment with carboxypeptidase. Our data show that it can, indicating that membrane-bound IgM lacks an extra hydrophobic piece.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , & Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 190, 420–431 (1971).

  2. 2.

    et al. J. exp. Med. 135, 1392–1405 (1972).

  3. 3.

    & Transplant. Rev. 14, 3–49 (1973).

  4. 4.

    & Transplant. Rev. 14, 76–130 (1973).

  5. 5.

    & Transplant. Rev. 14, 50–75 (1973).

  6. 6.

    , & Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun. 49, 964–969 (1972).

  7. 7.

    & Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 68, 1042–1046 (1971).

  8. 8.

    & Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 73, 2481–2485 (1976).

  9. 9.

    , , , & Science 182, 287–291 (1973).

  10. 10.

    , , , & Hoppe Seyler's Z. physiol. Chem. 354, 1505–1509 (1973).

  11. 11.

    , , & Biochem. J. 151, 615–624 (1975).

  12. 12.

    et al. J. exp. Med. 140, 742–763 (1974).

  13. 13.

    , & Eur. J. Immun. 4, 170–180 (1974).

  14. 14.

    , , & Cell 6, 149–159 (1975).

  15. 15.

    & FEBS Lett. 66, 215–220 (1976).

  16. 16.

    Meth. Enzym. 11, 155–166 (1967).

  17. 17.

    , & J. biol. Chem. 248, 7112–7117 (1975).

  18. 18.

    & Biochemistry 16, 145–152 (1977).

  19. 19.

    , , & J. Immun. 114, 1688–1691 (1975).

  20. 20.

    Nature 227, 680–685 (1970).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. ARC Institute of Animal Physiology, Brabaham, Cambridge, UK

    • R. A. J. MCILHINNEY
    • , N. E. RICHARDSON
    •  & A. FEINSTEIN

Authors

  1. Search for R. A. J. MCILHINNEY in:

  2. Search for N. E. RICHARDSON in:

  3. Search for A. FEINSTEIN in:

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/272555a0

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.