Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

X chromosome inactivation in diploid parthenogenetic mouse embryos

Abstract

THE mechanism by which one X chromosome in normal cells of female mammals becomes inactive while the other, apparently identical, chromosome remains active is not known. In kangaroos the paternally derived X chromosome is preferentially inactivated in most tissues1, and in mice and rats similar preferential inactivation of the paternal X chromosome occurs in the cells of the extraembryonic membranes2,3. Paternal X inactivation in kangaroos led Cooper4 to postulate that passage of the X chromosome through male gametogenesis was an important factor in its inactivation. He4 and Brown and Chandra5 suggested that paternal X inactivation was a primitive form and that random X inactivation as seen in adult eutherian mammals had evolved from it. Brown and Chandra further suggested that passage of one chromosome set through male gametogenesis or fertilisation led to chromosomal imprinting. A locus concerned in the control of X chromosome activity was postulated to become inactive when imprinted, and one active copy of this gene could maintain the activity of one X chromosome. In marsupials this gene was postulated to lie on the X chromosome itself, but on an autosome in euitherians. Thus, in eutherians the number of active X chromosomes in any animal should be equal to the number of maternally derived (and therefore non-imprinted) autosome sets. In this context it is interesting to study X inactivation in artificially formed parthenogenetic embryos, in which all chromosomes are of maternal origin. We report here that diploid parthenogenetic mouse embryos, at the late egg cylinder stage, showed a single late replicating chromosome, indicating that X inactivation had occurred normally. Because in the production of these embryos polar body formation had been suppressed, it seems that neither passage of chromosomes through male gametogenesis, nor fertilisation, nor probably the effects of peripheral egg cytoplasm are required for normal X inactivation in the mouse.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cooper, D. W. et al. in Isozymes III: Developmental Biology (ed. Market, L. C. ) 559 (Academic, New York, 1975).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Takagi, N. & Sasaki, M. Nature 256, 640–642 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wake, N., Takagi, N. & Sasaki, M. Nature, 262, 580–581 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cooper, D. W. Nature 230, 292–294 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, S. W. & Chandra, H. S. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70, 195–199 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lyon, M. F. Proc. R. Soc. B187, 243–268 (1974).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mukherjee, A. B. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 73, 1608–1611 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Takagi, N. Expl Cell Res. 86, 127–135 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Graham, C. F. Biol. Rev. 49, 399–422 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaufman, M. H., Barton, S. C. & Surani, M. A. H. Nature, 265, 53–55 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nesbitt, M. N. & Gartler, S. M. Cytogenetics 9, 212–221 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wroblewska, J. & Dyban, A. P. Stain Tech. 44, 147–150 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. McCaw, B. K. & Latt, S. A. Hum. Genet. 38, 253–264 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Linder, D. & Power, J. Ann. hum. Genet. 34, 21–30 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chandra, H. S. & Brown, S. W. Nature 253, 165–168 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Boué, A. & Boué, J. in Physiology and Genetics of Reproduction (eds Coutinho, E. M. & Fuchs, F.) B, 317–339 (Plenum, New York, 1974).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Fryns, J. P., Kerckhove, A. van de, Goddeeris, P. & Berghe, H. van den Hum. Genet. 38, 147–155 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lyon, M. F. in Reproduction and Evolution, Proceedings of the 4th Symposium on Comparative Biology of Reproduction (Australian Academy of Science, in the press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

KAUFMAN, M., GUC-CUBRILO, M. & LYON, M. X chromosome inactivation in diploid parthenogenetic mouse embryos. Nature 271, 547–549 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/271547a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/271547a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing