Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Differences in osmoregulation between wheat genotypes

Abstract

SEVERAL recent experiments provide evidence to support the existence of osmoregulation in plants as a means of counteracting water stresses induced by changes in the soil or evaporative environment1–3. Viewed in terms of energy potentials, decreases in the water potential, Ψ, induced by changes in the environment, are immediately offset by decreases in the osmotic potential, π, through an increase in solute content. The turgor potential, P, is thereby maintained since Ψ = π+P+τ (assuming that the matric potential, τ, is small or constant). The importance of this response is that expansion growth, which is affected directly by the turgor potential, is maintained over a range of values of Ψ2. Despite this obvious significance, little is known of the extent of this phenomenon in crop plants in general and in particular of differences between genotypes in the same or closely related species. Here we present evidence indicating substantial differences between several genotypes of wheat; in some osmoregulation was marked, whereas in others it was virtually non-existent.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hsiao, T. C. A. Rev. Pl. Physiol. 24, 519–570 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Greacen, E. L. & Oh, J. S. Nature new Biol. 235, 24–25 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Meyer, R. F. & Boyer, J. S. Planta 108, 77–87 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ehlig, C. F. Pl. Physiol. 37, 288–290 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Slatyer, R. O. & Barrs, H. D. UNESCO Arid Zone Res. 25, 331–342 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kassam, A. H. New Phytol. 72, 557–570 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Morgan, J. M. Aust. J. Pl. Physiol. 4, 75–86 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Turner, N. C. Pl. Physiol. 53, 360–365 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Warren-Wilson, J. Aust. J. biol. Sci. 20, 359–367 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MORGAN, J. Differences in osmoregulation between wheat genotypes. Nature 270, 234–235 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/270234a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/270234a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing