Letter | Published:

Electrophysiological distinctions between the taste and smell of amino acids in catfish

Naturevolume 266pages850851 (1977) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

VERTEBRATES possess two principal systems, olfaction and taste, adapted to respond to peripheral chemical excitation. Olfaction in terrestrial vertebrates is the more acute chemosensory system, having lower thresholds to volatile stimuli than the gustatory thresholds to nonvolatile compounds1,2; thus, olfaction was termed the ‘distance’ sense and gustation the ‘contact’ sense. With fishes, however, chemical stimuli are present in the aqueous medium and it is difficult to distinguish between olfactory and gustatory stimuli or to explain the development of two chemical senses in the primitive aquatic vertebrates. Fishes exhibit important morphological distinctions between olfactory and gustatory systems both at the periphery and centrally3, and yet, in catfish, amino acids are the most effective stimuli known for both systems4,5. This sensory overlap does not reflect a simple duplication of receptor function, however, as the olfactory and gustatory systems of catfish differ in amino acid sensitivity, specificity and response characteristics, which could allow for the functional separation of the chemical senses in an aquatic environment.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Herrick, C. J. Bull. U.S. Fish. Commis. 22, 237–272 (1904).

  2. 2

    Parker, G. H. J. exp. Zool. 8, 535–542 (1910).

  3. 3

    Bardach, J. E. & Villars, T. in Chemoreception in Marine Organisms (eds Grant, P. T. & Mackie, A. M.), 49–104 (Academic, New York, 1974).

  4. 4

    Suzuki, N. & Tucker, D. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 40 A, 399–404 (1971).

  5. 5

    Caprio, J. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 52 A, 247–251 (1975).

  6. 6

    Gesteland, R. C., Rowland, B., Lettvin, J. Y. & Pitts, W. H. Proc. Inst. Radio Engrs. 47, 1856–1862 (1959).

  7. 7

    Silver, W. L., Caprio, J., Blackwell, J. F. & Tucker, D. Experientia 32, 1216–1217 (1976).

  8. 8

    Ottoson, D. in Handbook of Sensory Physiology (Olfaction) (ed. Beidler, L. M.) 4, 95–131 (Springer, New York, 1971).

  9. 9

    Tucker, D. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 30, 1243–1245 (1973).

  10. 10

    Sato, T. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 43 A, 1–12 (1972).

  11. 11

    Sutterlin, A. M. & Sutterlin, N. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 28, 565–572 (1971).

  12. 12

    Tucker, D. Biophys. J. 15, 271a (1975).

  13. 13

    Dupree, H. K. & Halver, J. E. Trans. Am. fish. Soc. 99, 90–92 (1970).

  14. 14

    Mathewson, R. F. & Hodgson, E. S. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 42 A, 79–84 (1972).

  15. 15

    Bardach, J. E., Todd, J. H. & Crickmer, R. Science 155, 1276–1278 (1967).

  16. 16

    Sutterlin, A. M. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 32, 729–738 (1975).

  17. 17

    Todd, J. H., Atema, J. & Bardach, J. E. Science 158, 672–673 (1967).

  18. 18

    Atema, J. Brain Behav. Evol. 4, 273–294 (1971).

  19. 19

    Stevens, S. S. Psychol. Rev. 64, 153–181 (1957).

Download references

Author information

Author notes

    • JOHN CAPRIO

    Present address: Department of Zoology and Physiology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70803

Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, 32306

    • JOHN CAPRIO

Authors

  1. Search for JOHN CAPRIO in:

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Issue Date

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/266850a0

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.