Letter | Published:

Axotomy causes loss of muscarinic receptors and loss of synaptic contacts in the hypoglossal nucleus

Naturevolume 266pages734735 (1977) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

MUSCARINIC receptors in the brain and ileum can be studied by means of the binding of radiolabelled cholinergic antagonists1,2. The basic criteria for receptor-specific labelling are that there should be a saturable component of binding and that the binding of the radiolabelled ligand should be inhibited by pharmacologically effective concentrations of drugs which are known to act at muscarinic receptors and not by drugs that act at different receptors. In addition, the saturable binding component should be restricted to tissues known from pharmacological experiments to contain muscarinic receptors. These criteria are satisfied by tritiated propylbenzilylcholine mustard (3H-PrBCM)3, a potent irreversible muscarinic antagonist the binding of which to rat brain sections can be demonstrated autoradiographically. The evidence which suggests that the bulk of tissue radioactivity is associated with muscarinic receptors is that in autoradiographs the regional variation of autoradiographic grain density parallels the intensity of specific 3H-PrBCM binding observed by in vitro assay on brain homogenates from selected regions, and that in the homogenates 65–85% of the bound radioactivity is blocked by pretreatment with the classical muscarinic antagonist, atropine (10−6M). In the forebrain the general features of the distribution of 3H-PrBCM binding to thin sections correspond closely with the findings of Kuhar and Yamamura4,5 who used the non-covalently bound antagonist 3H-3-quinuclidinylbenzilate. We report here, however, that in the brain stem the hypoglossal nuclei are heavily labelled with 3H-PrBCM. In light microscopic autoradiographs (Fig. 1a, left side) the grains are distributed throughout the neuropil of the hypoglossal nucleus. The cytoplasm and nuclei of the large hypoglossal neuronal somata (Fig. 1b) are unlabelled. The density of the silver grains falls abruptly at the borders of the hypoglossal neuropil. This clear demarcation of the labelled hypoglossal neuropil is abolished by atropine pretreatment (Fig. 1c).

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Snyder, S. H., Chang, K. J., Kuhar, M. J. & Yamamura, H. I. Fed Proc. 34, 1915–1921 (1975).

  2. 2

    Birdsall, N. J. M. & Hulme, E. C. J. Neurochem. 27, 7–16 (1976).

  3. 3

    Burgen, A. S. V., Hiley, C. R. & Young, J. M. Br. J. Pharmac. 51, 279–285 (1974).

  4. 4

    Kuhar, M. J. & Yamamura, H. I. Nature 253, 560–561 (1975).

  5. 5

    Kuhar, M. J. & Yamamura, H. I. Brain Res. 110, 229–243 (1976).

  6. 6

    Hamberger, A., Hansson, H.-A. & Sjöstrand, J. J. Cell Biol. 47, 319–331 (1970).

  7. 7

    Sumner, B. E. H. Expl Neural. 46, 605–615 (1975); 49, 406–417 (1975).

  8. 8

    Sumner, B. E. H. & Sutherland, F. I. J. Neurocytol. 2, 315–328 (1973).

  9. 9

    Cull, R. E. Expl Brain Res. 20, 307–310 (1974).

  10. 10

    Sumner, B. E. H. Expl Brain Res. 26, 141–150 (1976).

  11. 11

    Miledi, R. J. Physiol., Lond. 151, 1–23 (1960).

  12. 12

    Axelsson, J. & Thesleff, S. J. Physiol., Lond. 147, 178–193 (1959).

  13. 13

    Kuffler, S. W., Dennis, M. J. & Harris, A. J. Proc. R. Soc. B. 177, 555–563 (1971).

  14. 14

    Brown, G. L. & Pascoe, J. E. J. Physiol., Lond. 123, 565–573 (1954).

  15. 15

    Brenner, H. R. & Martin, A. R. J. Physiol., Lond. 260, 159–175 (1976).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London, NW7, UK

    • A. ROTTER
    • , N. J. M. BIRDSALL
    • , A. S. V. BURGEN
    • , P. M. FIELD
    •  & G. RAISMAN

Authors

  1. Search for A. ROTTER in:

  2. Search for N. J. M. BIRDSALL in:

  3. Search for A. S. V. BURGEN in:

  4. Search for P. M. FIELD in:

  5. Search for G. RAISMAN in:

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Issue Date

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/266734a0

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.